Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave wrote: At an altitude of 100,000 feet 1000 mw [1 watt] should reach to the radio horizon of about 300 miles assuming a good receiver on the far end of the range. Do you mean that I should be able to pick up a signal from 300 miles away??? I don't believe I understand the forces at work here. A vertically polarized 1/2 wavelength antenna should work fine. At least it would be my starting point. Second option would be an inverted [upside down] 1/4 wavelength ground plane. Either antenna is not expensive. I was hoping to only put an antenna on the vehicle that I chase the balloon with. It weighs too much to put it on the balloon itself. However, would it decrease my performance that much??? I asked this similar question to Aerocomm(who manufactures the radios). They sent me two possible antennas, but I'm not sure either is really what I want. http://www.coronaos.com/hg908y.pdf http://www.coronaos.com/hg908p.pdf What information is to be transmitted? If you are looking for moderate speed telemetry then a path loss versus error rate study needs to be done. If data is being transmitted a gain antenna may be required at the receiver. Gain antennas are not expensive and the antenna needs to be pointed at and follow the balloon's flight path. I'm not really sure how much data is transmitted. You need to check out the product description for these devices. From a programmer's perspective, I don't need to do any initializing of the radio. Whatever data I transmit out of the serial port is what shows up out of the other radio's serial port. Pretty basic. I am not planning to send images back, just little bits of data. But I would like the reliability of the connection to be such that I could send back a photo if I needed to. It would be nice if somebody could give me a link to a website where I could buy the proper antenna with a proper connector. Here is the e-mail from Aerocomm: You can try one of the antennas that I have attached information on. The panel offers better overall coverage while the yagi is more focused and covers longer distance. These are not officially approved for use by the FCC. Remember that the ConnexLink has a reverse polarity SMA jack for the antenna connector. Thanks for all the replies! Brett |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Passive Repeater | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
The "Almost" Delta Loop Antenna for Limited Space Shortwave Listening (SWL) made from TV 'type' Parts | Shortwave | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave |