| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I Googled SommerAntennas so I could get a look at what you are writing about and
got a 'Could not be found' message for http://www.sommerantennas.com/. In either case a LP design has many solutions for a given frequency range for number of elements, spacing, etc. A true LPDA will operate anywhere within it's minimum and maximum frequency range. That is: a 13.5 to 33 MHz design will operate ANYWHERE within that range and meet published specifications for Gain, VSWR, efficiency, without the need for ANY on tower tuning, etc. [An LP does NOT have the 20, 17, 15, 12 and 10 meter bands!!! It has FULL coverage ANYWHERE within it's published minimum and maximum frequencies.] A LP design is a driven array NOT a parasitic [YAGI} design. It's major advantage is the very broad bandwidth it covers without tuning, traps, or stubs. It provides slightly less 'gain' than a 3 element triband Yagi. A Long John single band YAGI will have 3 to 6 dB additional gain above a LP, but the YAGI is band limited. - - - jawod wrote: The Sommer design is stated as having "phasing line similar to log periodic array". Am I correct in thinking that it is not a true LPA because of different element sizing and spacing than an LPA? If so, what is the advantage of the "LPA-like" phasing line in this case? John AB8O |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sommer versus SteppIR | Antenna | |||
| Starting point for antenna design | Antenna | |||
| CCrane Radio Plus responses - many thanks | Shortwave | |||
| Inviting Entries to Electronic Design Contest to win cash $100 | Homebrew | |||
| Call for a *practical* design for a 5 or 6 element wideband yagi using a hertz dipole as DE | Antenna | |||