Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
The reflected wave is incapable of looking ahead and using its free will to decide how much energy to contain depending upon its future fate. But that is what some people would have us believe. Those are the bad people, evidently. Does your question imply: A reflected wave that is going to be dissipated in a circulator resistor sometime in the future contains energy but a reflected wave that is going to be dissipated after the power is turned off does not contain energy? The question implies that there are issues regarding the flow of energy which you continue to misunderstand. Your answer confirms this. In a one second long lossless transmission line, watts equal joules. A forward wave of 200 watts contains 200 joules of energy. A reflected wave of 100 watts contains 100 joules of energy. Under such conditions, the source has supplied exactly 300 joules more than has been delivered to the load, no more and no less. Is your claim that the above describes the system with, or without, the circulator load? 73, ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Old Microphone Connector | Boatanchors | |||
Anderson 'Powerpole' Connectors | Homebrew | |||
FS: Coax Connectors, Switch, Relay | Swap | |||
Ranger II 8 prong plug | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna |