In article , "Reg Edwards"
g4fgq,regp@ZZZbtinternet,com wrote:

John,

I would like to reply to your question (if that's what it is) but I am
unable to understand what you are saying.

So I leave it to Cecil and Co. to add further to the complications and
confusion.

It's really all very simple.
----
Reg.

Hello, Reg. What I didn't understand was your statement "Reflections are
functions of TIME, not frequency." That statement immediately invited
conflict with the info contained in my electromagnetics and transmission
line theory texts lining my office bookshelf. I attempted to provide some
clarification and hopefully not insult anyone's intelligence. Sincerely,

John Wood (Code 5550) e-mail:
Naval Research Laboratory
4555 Overlook Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20375-5337