Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Jim. You're correct in every respect of course, and the
cautions you've given are essentially the same as what I had already established for myself. However, I think you'd be a little surprised (as I was) to find that there's a lack of specific guidance in the industry on these situations. At least based on my research to date. I've found lots of anecdotal tales of arcing and sparking in these situations, but thus far nothing involving personal injury or worse. Thus far, the worst consequence I've heard of has been a plant trip. Even that is a million dollar or so event though. I'm not asking anyone to provide input on safety procedures; just trying to pick up some ideas on what theory predicts. Maybe I should pose a purely theoretical puzzler unrelated to safety, scaffolding, or power plants. There's a loop in a square configuration, 3 meters on a side, adjacent to a long conductor carrying 1400 amps AC at 60 Hz. The side nearest the conductor is 1 meter from it. The loop is made of aluminum tubing 75cm in diameter. What current is induced in the loop when it is closed? What voltage exists across the gap if a gap is cut into the loop? 73--Nick, WA5BDU BTW: 1,400 is 5% of 28,000 - I've worked on some of those really big battery banks too. Jim Higgins wrote: On 23 Aug 2006 11:32:31 -0700, wrote: I'm a long-time reader of this NG and so realize that there is a lot of knowledge of EM principles on tap here. I'm pondering a non-ham issue from my workplace (a power plant) and could use a little education or peer checking of my ideas. I think it's good that you're pondering, but I think any consideration of changes in the established work methods should be avoided unless they are discussed with and approved by personnel charged with workplace safety. The power industry wasn't born yesterday and if people aren't dying or being injured using current practices I think it ill advised to make changes on your own based on your own conjecture and most especially based on conjecture from others without experience in the same environment. Working around large lead acid batteries for 30 years - and I'm talking stuff that will easily deliver 10,000 DC amperes to a short, I've seen people who thought they knew better than the those who established procedures for them to follow very severely injured. Not the same thing at all as 28,000 AC amperes, but if you have to ask first then you shouldn't be making changes. Just my opinion. No offense intended. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Castro Dying? | Shortwave | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | General | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
routing coax through strong DC magnetic fields | Antenna | |||
Electric and Magnetic fields | Antenna |