Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
However, any amount of reflected power from the termination at the far end of a transmission line has a greater chance of damaging tx PA components, and of stress/failure to the transmission line itself than if the reflected power from the antenna/load was zero, regardless of the electrical length of said transmission line. This reality of physics is not subject to debate, don't you agree? Suppose I have a 50 ohm antenna fed with a one wavelength, 50 ohm transmission line. No reflected power, no damage. Now I replace the 50 ohm one wavelength line with a 300 ohm one wavelength line. For 100 watts delivered to the load, the forward power on the line is 204 watts and the reverse power is 104 watts. All that reverse power could do a lot of damage, then? So I guess I should replace the 50 ohm load with a 300 ohm one. Then there won't be any reflected power, and the transmitter should be ok. Right? After all, it's physics. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Workman BS-1 Dipole Antenna = Easy Mod to make it a Mini-Windom Antenna ! | Shortwave | |||
Antenna Suggestions and Lightning Protection | Shortwave | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Introduction to "AM" Medium Wave DXing - by the Ontario DX Association (ODXC) | Shortwave | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |