Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:24:08 -0600, "Bruce Wilson"
wrote: I was thinking that maybe the efficiency of an antenna resonant at 3.5 MHz would be poor at 3.8 MHz where I want to use it. If there is no diminution of efficiency when the tuner fixes the impedance, then I'll just keep using it as is. Bruce, I have some antenna system loss plots for a G5RV IV using different types of feedline at http://www.vk1od.net/G5RV/index.htm . There is a narrow optimal area around the 75/80m band, and the impact depends on the length and grade of the coax used, ie the coax loss. The exact frequency range will depend to some extent on your own installation. I would suggest that if you wanted to minimise the coax loss on 3.8MHz, you could adjust (shorten?) the dipole or the open wire section, but that will also affect the other bands. Though it will affect the other bands, the win on 3.8MHz might be worthwhile as the antenna is less critical and lower loss on those higher bands on which it performs reasonably. Owen PS: liked your pics, very impressive even when viewed at screen resolution. -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
G5RV vs. G5RV Jr. | Antenna | |||
G5RV or 135 foot doublet or Carolina Windom? | Antenna | |||
Long wire vs. G5RV/dipole | Shortwave | |||
G5RV is the closest you can go | Homebrew | |||
G5RV is the closest you can go | Homebrew |