Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim - NN7K wrote:
wrote: On 06 Sep 2006 22:55:06 GMT, Ed wrote: Is there anything worth monitoring above 1300 MHz? Just wondering. Depends where you are at: Have a friend , has a 10 GHz beacon, in Puget Sound, as well as a 1296 Beacon ( W7HR) and gets copied out to couple hundred miles (or so), and occasionally, much further away (these, as he described, are aimed at Mt. Rainier). Long haul by Tropo ducting, ect. Mighrt have others running by now! Jim NN7K We are looking for some possible rain scatter propogation from VE3KRP here in the Twin Cities on 10 Gigs this evening. Might happen, might not. tom K0TAR |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The ONE thing, in 40 years (or so! ) playing with higher freqs is -- ANYTHING is POSSIBLE !! Good Luck, & 73 Jim We are looking for some possible rain scatter propogation from VE3KRP here in the Twin Cities on 10 Gigs this evening. Might happen, might not. tom K0TAR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Is there anything worth monitoring above 1300 MHz? Just wondering. Depends where you are at: Have a friend , has a 10 GHz beacon, in Puget Sound, as well as a 1296 Beacon ( W7HR) and gets copied out to couple hundred miles (or so), and occasionally, much further away (these, as he described, are aimed at Mt. Rainier). Long haul by Tropo ducting, ect. Mighrt have others running by now! Jim NN7K Ah, ham beacons/MW activity ... an exception I hadn't considered for scanner usage. But the discone that guy bought wouldn't be more useful than the Diamond for activity at 10GHz, I'd think. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeh, would be as effective as a piece of waveguide
filled full of pencil lead! Great dummy load--Jim Ed wrote: Ah, ham beacons/MW activity ... an exception I hadn't considered for scanner usage. But the discone that guy bought wouldn't be more useful than the Diamond for activity at 10GHz, I'd think. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|