Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I use an 80 watt Weller iron. It holds far more
heat (not temperature) than my 250 watt soldering gun. Because of the heat capacity of the iron, the holes solder very quickly and easily. It is not necessary to pre-tin the braid. A 100 watt iron might be a little better, but they are harder to find. Some hardware stores carry the 80w Weller. Tom - N1MM Check out the N1MM Free Contest Logger at: http://www.n1mm.com http://groups.yahoo.com/group/N1MMLogger/ "W7TI" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:33:18 -0500, Bob Miller wrote: Get a 175 watt Weller, then you'll be able to solder it through the four holes in just a few seconds, like it's designed for. Bob k5qwg __________________________________________________ _______ I have a 250 watt Weller (about 45 years old now) and soldering through the four holes is a pain, as well as being uncertain. Soldering the braid where it enters the connector can be done with a 40 watt iron, helping avoid damage to the coax. Give it a try, you might like it. -- 73, Bill W7TI |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:42:26 -0700, W7TI wrote:
Maybe this has been done before, but it's the first time I've heard of this method. I've used it here with no problems. Outside I use N connectors for nearly all connections. While struggling as usual to attach some PL-259s to some Belden 9913F, it occurred to me that the four little holes for soldering the braid For the purist connecting there helps keep the impedance correct, BUT as you took the braid inside I would expect about the same. Contrary to what some have said, I've not been able to see any bump using a Time Domain Reflectometer (TDR) with that approach. were not really needed. Instead, I soldered the braid directly to the connector at the point where it entered. Picture at: www.dslextreme.com/users/teeaye/coax.jpg I soldered it all around the connector, although I suppose only one point would be ok. All around is better The braid is exposed so it would need weatherproofing for outside use. But all in all, it seems to me to be far superior to trying to solder through the little holes. It's much stronger and you can easily see if you have a good connection. When it comes to weather proofing, PL259s are not weather proof. You just make it a little easier for the water to get in. I use "flooded" heat shrink tube over the connector and out onto the coax by about an inch and a half. I purchase it in 4' lengths at the local electrical supply house. The flooding material is pretty much the same stuff used in hot glue guns. You have to remember to start shrinking the tube in the middle and work out to the ends Also, only a small-wattage iron is needed. I used a 40-watt Weller, which is not hot enough doing it the normal way. There is less metal acting as a heat sink. Another advantage is you can trim the braid much farther back from where Here you don't want to trim it back much father than the normal installation. I cut and trim to length, then tin the braid. If need be (and it usually is) I file down the solder so the braid easily fits all the way in to the proper position and I don't have to worry about "whiskers". you strip the center conductor. This helps reduce the chances of a stray strand causing a short. The only drawback I can see would be if the coax were hanging down and swinging in the breeze - the solder could develop metal fatigue over time. On the other hand, the coax should be strain-relieved anyway, else it's just holding on by the four holes and the center conductor. Yes, Yes, and no. Yes, the solder will eventually fatigue. Yes the connection should be supported, or strain relieved. No, those little solder spots are an electrical connection, not to support the cable. Most of what little strength a pl259 has, comes from the jacket being screwed down into the connector. Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member) www.rogerhalstead.com N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2) Not much better, if at all. Comments? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Another thing that you can be sure of. Rarely does it matter.
"Nisse" wrote in message ... (the only thing You can be sure of, it is not 50 ohm characteristic impedance)... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Mark:
[snip] Myself, I think using a high wattage gun is one of the most important parts. It's hard to get them hot enough with a small 30-50?? watt gun. To properly solder, you have to get the shell itself hot enough to melt the solder. Otherwise, you have a cold joint. But, on the other hand, you also don't want to sit there for 8 min trying to get it hot enough, when in the meantime the coax melts into a blob. So you have to get in and out fast. A hot gun is the only way. I've been using a 150 w for quite a few years and it seems big enough unless you are outside in the wind. [snip] Agreed! If you are just getting a new iron for coax connector work, go for a big fat 200 Watt job. It not only gets the temperature correct for perfect joints, but because it is big it can supply a lot of heat quickly without temperature drop and that's the secret to great PL259 connector soldering jobs. The 200 Watts ensures that you can do connectors quickly and with quality even out doors on field day with the wind blowing. Dont' fuss, don't worry... Just do it right! A Big Fat 200 Watt iron makes soldering coax to PL259's dead simple! -- Peter K1PO Indialantic By-the-Sea, FL. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Personally, I've had the best luck with a 100-200 watt iron for soldering the
shell. The iron, assuming it has a heavy tip, has enough heat capacity to do the job quickly. With a soldering gun, even a 150 or 200 watt gun, the tip just doesn't have enough thermal capacity to do the job as quickly. But, whatever works is fine. 73s, Evan |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
W7TI wrote: On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:48:46 +0200, Nisse wrote: This is rather amusing... A debate how to attach PL-259.... Would'nt it be better if we finally got rid of those aniquities (the only thing You can be sure of, it is not 50 ohm characteristic impedance)... __________________________________________________ _______ Getting rid of a connector which is standard all over the world? Now *that's* amusing. :-) BNC or N are also standards all over the world. So is C, however it is a bit tricky to find. PL-259 is hardly useable above 50MHz, and totally worthless above approx. 300MHz (why PL-259 is the standard for 144MHz rigs is definitively beyond my undersanding- for commercial 80MHz LMR, BNC or C is standard, depending on power output). -- 73, Bill W7TI |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
W7TI wrote:
On 24 Jul 2003 21:19:45 -0700, (John Shrove) wrote: www.dslextreme.com/users/teeaye/coax.jpg Terrible picture. it looks like a cold joint. __________________________________________________ _______ Terrible interpretation. Joint is perfect. It might be, but the picture is still pretty poor... makes it hard to tell just how good the solder job really is. Dan |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Attaching wire to tubing?? | Antenna |