Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Jimmie D wrote: Im sure the numbers would look even wose if the licenses expired sooner. Most of the new hams I know lose interest in a couple of years, long befor the licence expires. Those darned new hams. They never should have been licensured in the first place. Didn't have the ooomph to get licensed when the tests were harder so they weren't really that innerested in the first place. Didn't show the proper dedication. and of course none of the failure of hams to reamin hams is due to bull**** they must endure from other hams Of course not! Ham radio is a swell fellowship of men. What you see on RRAP n't ham radio. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Jimmie D wrote: and of course none of the failure of hams to reamin hams is due to bull**** they must endure from other hams Of course not! Ham radio is a swell fellowship of men. What you see on RRAP n't ham radio. realy it isn't that much different from what i encounters on air with a sad frequency |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Jimmie D wrote: and of course none of the failure of hams to reamin hams is due to bull**** they must endure from other hams Of course not! Ham radio is a swell fellowship of men. What you see on RRAP n't ham radio. realy it isn't that much different from what i encounters on air with a sad frequency Well then Mark, do you think, just for a second, that possibly, just maybe, that it could be YOU that brings out the best in everyone? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Jimmie D wrote: Im sure the numbers would look even wose if the licenses expired sooner. Most of the new hams I know lose interest in a couple of years, long befor the licence expires. Those darned new hams. They never should have been licensured in the first place. Didn't have the ooomph to get licensed when the tests were harder so they weren't really that innerested in the first place. Didn't show the proper dedication. and of course none of the failure of hams to reamin hams is due to bull**** they must endure from other hams Of course not! Ham radio is a swell fellowship of men. What you see on RRAP n't ham radio. But if you and Markie ever get full HF privledges, God & Hiram Help us. Why? Do you fear us working out of band Frenchmen? We could do that just as well on 6 Meters. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: an_old_friend wrote: But if you and Markie ever get full HF privledges, God & Hiram Help us. Why? Do you fear us working out of band Frenchmen? We could do that just as well on 6 Meters. BB I belieeve you have mentioned passing a code test at some point that would allow you fullaccess to hf today I could look up your license or you could tell me |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: an_old_friend wrote: But if you and Markie ever get full HF privledges, God & Hiram Help us. Why? Do you fear us working out of band Frenchmen? We could do that just as well on 6 Meters. BB I belieeve you have mentioned passing a code test at some point that would allow you fullaccess to hf today I could look up your license or you could tell me I passed the Novice exam in Nov 1986. 5WPM. I'm presently a General, so I'm fully qualified to work out of band Frenchmen on 6M or on HF. Maybe they'll even put me in for the ARRL's A-1 Operator Club. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"an_odd_freak" wrote in
ups.com: wrote: Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: an_old_friend wrote: But if you and Markie ever get full HF privledges, God & Hiram Help us. Why? Do you fear us working out of band Frenchmen? We could do that just as well on 6 Meters. BB I belieeve you have mentioned passing a code test at some point that would allow you fullaccess to hf today I could look up your license or you could tell me The FCC still has the old CB calls in a database? SC |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slow Code wrote:
It didnt keep you out |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in
ups.com: Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Jimmie D wrote: Im sure the numbers would look even wose if the licenses expired sooner. Most of the new hams I know lose interest in a couple of years, long befor the licence expires. Those darned new hams. They never should have been licensured in the first place. Didn't have the ooomph to get licensed when the tests were harder so they weren't really that innerested in the first place. Didn't show the proper dedication. and of course none of the failure of hams to reamin hams is due to bull**** they must endure from other hams Of course not! Ham radio is a swell fellowship of men. What you see on RRAP n't ham radio. But if you and Markie ever get full HF privledges, God & Hiram Help us. Why? Do you fear us working out of band Frenchmen? We could do that just as well on 6 Meters. And on CB. SC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
shortwv | Shortwave | |||
178 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave |