Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well this is where I am comming from, I am presently building an
antenna for this winter where I will be communicating with the U.K. Thus my major lobe needs to be robust between about 10 degtrees and 4 degrees to ensnare most of the communication. Notwithstanding that the upper half of the major lobe serves no usefull purpose to what the antenna is required for there is a mass of radiation in many directions and levels that have no connection to the required purpose of the antenna, thus we have a lot of wasted radiation that if we harness it so that it is used for the antennas primary use the efficiency of the antenna would increase immensly. So to the question, accepting that the major lobe is required in its entirety for the antennas required use I feel that less than 50% of available radiation is used for the antennas design usage and that also includes the upper lobe as not being a positive contributor However I have no real figures to hang my hat on........ O.K.? Art Tom Ring wrote: art wrote: When one looks at a.radiating array pattern one can see that the yagi is very inefficient. Does anybody know of the relative volume Art Art Yagis, when made of almost anything but something like nichrome wire, are very efficient. Aluminum element yagis run in the high 90's of percent efficiency when properly designed. My bet is that you aren't speaking of efficiency at all, but something you don't know the words to express. Try to explain what you mean, and this group may be able to help you. tom K0TAR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tape Measure Yagi Antenna Questions | Antenna | |||
SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
GP -> yagi driven element? | Antenna | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
Quad vs Yagi (or log) | Antenna |