Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "art" wrote in message ups.com... Richard Clark wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 19:09:38 -0700, "art" wrote: Notwithstanding that the upper half of the major lobe serves no usefull purpose to what the antenna is required for there is a mass of radiation in many directions and levels that have no connection to the required purpose of the antenna, thus we have a lot of wasted radiation that if we harness it so that it is used for the antennas primary use the efficiency of the antenna would increase immensly. Hi Art, The classic solution is to stack yagis vertically. This draws down the higher radiation lobes and puts their gain in the forward direction. Well you are getting closer to the question at hand. You have now doubled the power input but only slightly gained directionality(2db) efficiency I would also suspect that you have flattened the lower lobe only into a pancake shape. But again I go back to the desirable radiation which can be said in this case to be the lower half of the major lobes half power envelope which for a directional radiated array is very small compared to the total radiated field.True propagation can play games but the ARRL give the average arrival angles over a 11 year period so it is not a hopeless task to get a ball park figure regarding usefull radiation knowing where the target is I suppose I could make a model and slice out the half power lobe portion and compare the two volumes for myself, I just thought that it had already been looked at Oh well back to the drawing board Art what you are missing is the variability in that arrival angle. if you are interested in a specific path you must be able to receive all the possible arrival angles, which with yagi's requires mounting several of them at different heights. for instance consider a path from w1 to western europe at the sunspot peak on 10m... it is not uncommon for the band to open at a very low angle, say where a single yagi at 120' is the best antenna, then as the day progresses the angle increases so much that the 120' antenna is almost worthless but one at only 30' is working great. if you put everything into getting that 10-12 degree angle you lose out by mid morning when the arrival angle is up to 30 degrees or more... but at the same time that top antenna may be working great into siberia! what you are looking for is not normally called 'efficiency', but 'directivity'. unfortunately horizontally polarized yagi's vertical radiation pattern is very dependent on height and the terrain so increasing the directivity is seen mostly in the width of the pattern. and as noted above, controlling the vertical pattern is normally done by changing the antenna height, usually by stacking multiple antennas on the tower and selecting them one at a time or in combinations to give the desired vertical coverage. There have been some experiments with variable phasing of stacked yagis, but it is not a common capability in amateur installations. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tape Measure Yagi Antenna Questions | Antenna | |||
SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
GP -> yagi driven element? | Antenna | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
Quad vs Yagi (or log) | Antenna |