Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Clark wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 17:05:44 -0700, "art" wrote: Hi Art, To close this out, we have discovered through the various correspondents that: When one looks at a.radiating array pattern one can see that the yagi is very inefficient. Is false. That much is clear through evidence, no theory necessary. Does anybody know of the relative volume contained in the main radiation lobe versus the total volume of the entire pattern? Yes, someone does. It was pointed out quite clearly that ALL the gain from sidelobe or back lobe could not be assembled into very much constructive gain. Economists call this the law of diminishing return. A casual look at a yagi radiation pattern would suggest that it is less than 50% efficient at best Is false. One can certainly contrive for abysmal efficiency (you use mylar and bamboo in place of tubing don't you?); but that does not make the range of yagis fall into disrepute through aberrations of one designer. especially when considering Is false - there are no externalities, except local ground loss, to an antenna (and that exception is because ground is part of the radiating system). DX work snip That was funny You don't have any choice in the matter. No element pair is ever going to offer better. No element pair etc pretty specific statement which offers safety No single yagi is going to draw the peak ............................ But you are sticking with the inefficient Yagi, that should make it a safe statement I would listen more intently if you stated that the angle cannot be drawn down regardless of the array used launch angle down to the elevations I've already identified. A stack of yagis is hardly likely either. Again you cover yourself my involving the inefficient Yagi The long and short of it is that you are facing 0.001% "efficiency" without any probable method to even budge it up to 0.0015%. Creationist scienze might help tho'. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Well it still gave me a laugh seeing you seeking safety in the Yagi shadow Do you also agree with what Roy said in a senior moment about wasted yagi energy? Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tape Measure Yagi Antenna Questions | Antenna | |||
SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
GP -> yagi driven element? | Antenna | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
Quad vs Yagi (or log) | Antenna |