Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Sep 2006 12:55:37 -0700, "art" wrote:
As I have oft times stated I am looking at the whole pattern in three dimensional form and you keep trotting out answers based on a two dimensional format Art, The same process in any plane reveals the same net result: you are not going to achieve any more "efficiency" than that already offered by a Yagi. In fact, your design probably suffers extensively with regard to "efficiency." But no one knows this mystery design, do they? Sorry, but Fritz has already cornered the market on flim-flam. He has probably been more efficient about it too (if measured in sucker deposits). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tape Measure Yagi Antenna Questions | Antenna | |||
SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
GP -> yagi driven element? | Antenna | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
Quad vs Yagi (or log) | Antenna |