Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Given that I can only have one antenna and it has to be a single
vertical, not exceeding 45 feet, I'm seeking advice on the best way to achieve this. The feed point must be at at ground level and will be 100 Metres away fed with low loss coaxial cable. I can lay down a good radial system and ground rod at the feed point. I'd like to use the antenna on all HF bands, or as many as possible from 1.8 MHz up. My choices seem to be, 1. A commercial HF Multiband antenna eg, HF9V or 2. A vertical wire supported by a 40'-45' fiberglass pole with an auto ATU at the base, eg SG230. Q . Which way to go? Naturally I'd like to achieve some low angle radiation on some bands. I'd appreciate any advice on which would be the most efficient system given my constraints. Anything else I haven't thought of ? 73, F5VJC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Deni! How about a vertical Zepp. It does not need any counterpoise. I did some experiments with this type of antenna. You will find it as a 'no counterpoise antenna' via Google. It consists of a parallel wire and on one of the two wires an extended wire is connected. X====================----------------------------------------- The drawing is horizontal, but use it as a vertical antenna! At the point X a Balun converts from symetrical to coax - or direct into an ATU. The Balun is a red core with a 5 turns RG-174 wound twice. Look here http://home.datacomm.ch/hb9abx/mws.htm I use a version on a 12m fiber glass and it gave very good results. Drop me a line if you need more info, email: oe1mww(at)qsl.net 73 Wolfgang OE1MWW |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Deni foxfiveVJC" skrev i meddelandet ... Given that I can only have one antenna and it has to be a single vertical, not exceeding 45 feet, I'm seeking advice on the best way to achieve this. The feed point must be at at ground level and will be 100 Metres away fed with low loss coaxial cable. I can lay down a good radial system and ground rod at the feed point. I'd like to use the antenna on all HF bands, or as many as possible from 1.8 MHz up. My choices seem to be, 1. A commercial HF Multiband antenna eg, HF9V or 2. A vertical wire supported by a 40'-45' fiberglass pole with an auto ATU at the base, eg SG230. Q . Which way to go? Naturally I'd like to achieve some low angle radiation on some bands. I'd appreciate any advice on which would be the most efficient system given my constraints. Anything else I haven't thought of ? 73, F5VJC Hi, I have used a simular setup as nr 2. I use a Chinese CG-2000 automatic tuner and it works OK on all HF bands. Gives you alot of options on how to attach your wire. I have used glassfiber rods and also tried a more LW like slanting of the wire. Can really be a flexible antenna. It's not as complex as commercial multiband antennas. It's critical to have a good RF ground but I live close to a lake so no problem with the radials..... Go for nr 2.... / SM0FKI Ulf |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Deni foxfiveVJC wrote:
2. A vertical wire supported by a 40'-45' fiberglass pole with an auto ATU at the base, eg SG230. If the vertical is much over 5/8WL long, its take- off-angle is too high for proper operation. 5/8WL ~600/f = 21 feet on 10m. Your 40-45 foot height would only be good up to about 14.3 MHz unless you figure out a way to shorten the wire above that frequency. Here's another idea using the same space and this is my present vertical antenna. Make the vertical 21 feet long and locate its top at 42 feet. The feedpoint is then 21 feet in the air. Install elevated radials acting as guy wires at that 21 foot level along with the SG-230. That will give you pretty good 40m-10m operation. For reasonable 80m operation, install a loading coil at the feedpoint, in for 80m and shorted for all the other HF bands. According to EZNEC, on 10m, that antenna has: *** 4.2 dBi omni gain with a TOA of 11 degrees *** -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cecil Moore"
If the vertical is much over 5/8WL long, its take- off-angle is too high for proper operation. 5/8WL ~600/f = 21 feet on 10m. Your 40-45 foot height would only be good up to about 14.3 MHz unless you figure out a way to shorten the wire above that frequency. ____________ Just to note that the peak field _generated_ by a ground-mounted vertical up to 5/8 wavelength high always occurs in the horizontal plane. Ground losses for the displacement currents in the earth gathered by a buried radial network within about 1/2 wavelength of the antenna will reduce this field from its theoretical maximum value, but peak relative gain _as radiated_ always will remain directed in the horizontal plane, regardless of the amount of those ground losses. Calculating the "pattern" of a vertical radiator at an infinite distance from a site on the earth leads one to think that the radiator produces zero field in the horizontal plane, and that its maximum field _as it is radiated_ occurs at some higher angle. But this effect is only due to groundwave propagation losses related to earth conductivity, the r-f frequency, and earth curvature. It doesn't mean that the vertical radiator originally produced zero h-plane field -- just that the higher angle fields were the only ones to survive the trip to an infinite distance. If the above was not true, MW commercial broadcast stations would have essentially no daytime groundwave coverage. Their nighttime, distant skywave coverage also would be affected, because much of that is produced by elevation plane radiation between zero and +10 degrees. RF Visit http://rfry.org for FM transmission system papers. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, I made a big post and then lost it. Take two.
I've put up a 12m Spiderbeam pole + wire + base matching networks fed against 27 ground radials ranging from 20 to 40 feet long. I'm using it only on 80m, 60m, 40m, and 30m, and I've been quite happy with it. As Cecil mentioned, it should work quite on 20m as well, but on 17m and up it will have a less than desireable radiation pattern. I'd still recommend getting the pole and autotuner. I think the overall efficiency will be more related to what you can get in as ground radials than which antenna you use. I think that the cost is probably about the same in both cases. What you get with the 40 foot pole and autotuner approach is a 40 foot pole and an autotuner! Better parts to try out different antennas. As far as the bands above 17m, two suggestions come to mind. 1) For routine, easy copy communication on 17m and up, just use the antenna as is. It's bad for low angle radiation, but you're not going to notice the differerence when you're hearing s9 signals that could be s9+10dB instead. If good DX that you're having trouble hearing comes on 17m or above, go out, drop the pole a few sections, and reattach the wire to the tuner. Voila, your too-long vertical isn't anymore. Cecil's suggestion to use a 21 foot vertical instead is just fine, but you lose 80m in that case, and at this point in the sunspot cycle, I'd personally take inconvenient operation on 17 over giving up 80m. 2) An old approach using new parts, if you can run a couple of wires out at angles from the top of the pole. Put up an inverted-vee doublet at the top of the 40 foot pole. Make some open-wire line to feed it. On the lower bands, feed both feedline conductors against a good radial system. On the higher bands, feed the doublet as a doublet. I haven't tried this due to the lack of an autotuner, but I think it could work quite well. It doesn't exactly fit your criterion of one 40 to 45 foot vertical, but the visual impact is the same... maybe you've got some trees or could tie things off to the house ... it's a top loaded vertical on the lower bands, and a nice, high inverted vee on the higher bands. In the middle region, probably 30m and 40m, you could pick whether you were using the doublet or the vertical depending on who you were trying to contact. 73, Dan www.n3ox.net |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cecil Moore"
If the vertical is much over 5/8WL long, its take- off-angle is too high for proper operation. 5/8WL ~600/f = 21 feet on 10m. Your 40-45 foot height would only be good up to about 14.3 MHz unless you figure out a way to shorten the wire above that frequency. Cecil's absolutely right about this... but, a suggestion. Right now, above 14MHz, the bands aren't so hot. 17m is open a lot, 15m is open sometimes, 12&10 almost never. I'm using your setup #2 on 80m, 40m, and 30m and have been quite happy with it. The radial field is 27 radials ranging between about 20 feet and 40 feet (out to the edges of my yard) I'm using one of the 12m Spiderbeam poles. I built my own L-matching networks for the base, just because I didn't have an autotuner. I've noted good DX performance. I don't have any quantitative numbers, but I'd make my recommendation on another basis. I expect a good multiband vertical costs about the same as a 40 foot telescoping fiberglass pole + decent autotuner. Radial costs are the same... However, the antenna *versatility* of the pole + autotuner is much better. You get better parts for your money. You will certainly be able to load up a 40 foot vertical on 17m and up for noncritical communication.... when signals are s9, you won't notice that they're not s9+ 10dB. If some really good DX comes on 17 and conditions are marginal, go outside and drop the pole two or three sections and reattach the wire to the tuner! Now you've got a 5/8ths vertical on 17m! The pole will come in handy for portable and field use; the autotuner can be used to match whatever you want to try out in the back yard, and having a nonconductive fiberglass support is great for experimentation. Something I thought about trying, and would if I actually had an automatic tuner, is rigging up a short inverted vee doublet at the top of my 40 foot pole. It would be short enough to be only bidirectional on 20m and up. Also install a good radial field for the low bands. Homemade open wire line runs from the doublet at the top down to the ground. On 80, 40, and (maybe) 30m, feed both conductors of the feedline against ground. On 20m and up, feed the doublet as a doublet instead. You just need a couple of relays to perform the switching tasks remotely. This is an old approach to a multiband wire antenna with good performance on both the low and high bands. A nice pole and automatic tuner just makes it all the easier. In fact, if you want to save even more money, do the doublet/vertical thing but build one of Cecil's all-open-wire matching networks for the higher bands. Some relays and some ladder line, a pole that costs EUR 80, and a bunch of wire, and you've got a good antenna system. http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/notuner.htm One further thing to recommend the 40 foot telescoping fiberglass pole is that you can make it easily disappear when you want to. Mine stays inside when I'm not operating on the lower bands. Of course, I'm just using it as a vertical; it takes 1 minute to take it outside, clip on the guys, and raise the vertical wire. It would be a little more involved to put up and take down a doublet all the time. 73, Dan |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Um, the old post came back... sorry folks... pick the one you like
better :-) Dan |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|