Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
When Terman did his work what were considered to be "the broadcast
frequencies"? Even on 80 meters we are well above that range from that era... There is a major change in polarization response as we go from 160 to 80 meters, and again to 40 meters, etc. As an active antenna experimenter on 80 meters who keeps records of which antenna made which contacts, and with the ability to switch between relatively high horizontal antennas, and vertical antennas of both a quarter wave and a half wave in height (80 meters), I can tell you with certainty that less than 5% of my 80 meter DX contest contacts in 04 and 05 were made on the vertical antennas ... It is the rare DX station that is clearly better on the verticals compared to the high dipoles - and when they are stronger on the low angle verticals it is usually right as the band opens or closes... Based upon my antenna testing in previous years, for this year's CQWW I am replacing all the vertical arrays with horizontal arrays... At that point the only vertical arrays I will have left is on 160... My gut feeling, based on real results over multiple years, is that the incoming HF signals rarely peak below 10 degrees - probably less than 5% of the time... Another issue in Termans work is his decision to characterize the the F layer as a reflecting mirror... We now know that the ionosphere refracts and ducts signals as often as it reflects them... I can suggest that too low of a launch angle of the main wave is deleterious for HF DX in that such a shallow angle of incidence against the lower boundary of the F layer allows only reflection and does not allow the wave front to enter the ducting region higher up, which limits you to less than 1000 miles first hop.. Whereas a steeper launch angle results in the wave front penetrating the bottom of the F layer, being refracted to a shallower angle once inside the ducting region, being ducted long distances with far less absorption than it would for multiple hops, and then again refracting and exiting the duct at a steeper angle than one would expect for such a distance... This to my mind is a common mechanism for those amazingly strong DX openings we see... denny / k8do |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gain of Vertical Antenna | Antenna | |||
Cold Water Pipe Ground? | Antenna | |||
HF Vertical - ground mounted or 10-30 feet in air what works best for 20m-80m tx/rx | Antenna | |||
Oddity of ground mounted antenna's. | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General |