Tdonaly wrote:
You've spent countless hours arguing the case for your
interpretation of how waves work, and the only thing you've accomplished
is that you've antagonized a group of people more knowledgeable than
you are.

A group more knowledgeable about EM waves than Eugene Hecht? It is
not my interpretation of how waves work, Tom. It is the consensus
of opinions of experts from the field of optics. Non-glare glass
is exactly the same thing as a 1/4WL matching section in a transmission
line and how the interference causes the match is fully understood. If
proven, accepted knowledge from a closely related technical field
antagonizes a bunch of closed-minded ivory tower gurus on this newsgroup,
so be it.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----