Rick wrote:
What's to keep the same low-lifes from replying, "I agree
too, Dude", and re-directing it back to r.r.a.a?

Because they are clueless to how Usenet works. The message they are
replying to is NOT in r.r.a.a, it is now in some other newsgroup, and
there are let's say, 50 of them, so many that it is an annoyance to
even read through them. So when they finally have had enough after
reading 10 of the 50, they decide to reply, their stupid reply will
only go to the newsgroups that are in the message they are replying to
(which does NOT contain r.r.a.a). Ok? Got it?


Indeed, the major offender - the one who has extreme spelling
challenges, knows exactly what he is doing. He keeps multiple addresses
to avoid posting limits, and if you reply to his messages in a manner in
which he disagrees with, you'll get replies from all of 'em.

The wonderful people involved in this are branching out from their
usual newsgroups because they aren't getting the attention they crave
there. Most of the old regulars are gone from rrap, and if there isn't
anyone to fight with, it ain' no fun, man!

If you do use your tactic, which does have some attraction to it, you
might want an anonymizer.


- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

Michael Coslo wrote:
Rick wrote:


Indeed, the major offender - the one who has extreme spelling
challenges, knows exactly what he is doing. He keeps multiple addresses
to avoid posting limits, and if you reply to his messages in a manner in
which he disagrees with, you'll get replies from all of 'em.
not sure Mike if you are refering to me but thank you i do know what I
am doing OTOH you do not

tell me how did you moderated to death effort to rep[lace RRAP go
did you learn when you surpess desent you kill discusioons of issues

I never added radio NG to posting never I lleave as is since if I am
libled in the post I want the response to go to all of them I was
libeled in

prehaps mike is you had foucsed your anager on theose using slibel and
chrater assignation years ago instead of tolerating and rewarding it
things would not be so bad

but of course NOTHING is your responsiblity even in part

wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote:
Rick wrote:

Indeed, the major offender - the one who has extreme spelling
challenges, knows exactly what he is doing. He keeps multiple addresses
to avoid posting limits, and if you reply to his messages in a manner in
which he disagrees with, you'll get replies from all of 'em.
not sure Mike if you are refering to me but thank you i do know what I
am doing OTOH you do not

tell me how did you moderated to death effort to rep[lace RRAP go
did you learn when you surpess desent you kill discusioons of issues

I never added radio NG to posting never I lleave as is since if I am
libled in the post I want the response to go to all of them I was
libeled in

prehaps mike is you had foucsed your anager on theose using slibel and
chrater assignation years ago instead of tolerating and rewarding it
things would not be so bad

but of course NOTHING is your responsiblity even in part




And there you have it!

Thanks for proving my point Mr. Morgan. I don't really know why you do
what you do, but for whatever reason you do it.

_73 de mike KB3EIA -

Michael Coslo wrote:
wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote:

not sure Mike if you are refering to me but thank you i do know what I
am doing OTOH you do not

tell me how did you moderated to death effort to rep[lace RRAP go
did you learn when you surpess desent you kill discusioons of issues

I never added radio NG to posting never I lleave as is since if I am
libled in the post I want the response to go to all of them I was
libeled in

prehaps mike is you had foucsed your anager on theose using slibel and
chrater assignation years ago instead of tolerating and rewarding it
things would not be so bad

but of course NOTHING is your responsiblity even in part




And there you have it!

Thanks for proving my point Mr. Morgan.
what point?