Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 14:20:38 -0400, John Ferrell
wrote: I have been disapointed in the mechanical strength of the Aluminum electric fence wire. Aluminium is not very good material for fence wire and not usually a substitute for steel in general fencing as it lacks the strength of steel. There are fence wires made from a steel core (typically high tensile) and an aluminium (or aluminium / ~5% zinc) coating, sometimes with a polymer coating over the top. These products are appearing as the new "longlife galvanised" fence wires. Commonly the aluminium thickness is around 30 microns, way less than skin depth at low HF, so they can be expected to perform about as well as the high tensile steel core. There are other products with a 200 micron cladding of 60% conductivity aluminium over a high tensile core, and they look a good prospect for antenna wire, 80% RF conductivity and 10000% strength compared to the same diameter HDC. For example Gallagher XL 2.7mm diameter wire (200 micron aluminium cladding) should have the same loss as 2.3mm dia HDC, but over 10 times the Gross Breaking Strength. To determine their likely loss as antenna wires, you need to know the coating thickness. Owen -- |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Either you didn't read the remainder of what I wrote, or I failed to
explain it clearly. I was speaking of antennas of a constant length in terms of wavelength as frequency is changed, for example half wavelength dipoles. If you cut the frequency in half, the skin depth increases by a factor of the square root of two, so (assuming a conductor at least several skin depths in radius) the resistivity decreases by the square root of two. But to maintain a constant antenna length in terms of wavelength, the wire length doubles. So the total wire resistance at the lower frequency is greater by a factor of the square root of two. In other words, if you make two half wavelength dipoles out of the same diameter and kind of wire, and cut one for 1 MHz and the other for 2 MHz, the 1 MHz dipole will have about 1.4 times the resistance of the 2 MHz one. That's why you're more likely to see the loss of steel wire in lower frequency antennas. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Richard Harrison wrote: Roy, W7EL wrote: "---the loss with a given wire size gets greater as you go lower in frequency,---. Effective resistance to r.f, is approximately proportional to the square root of the frequency due to "skin effect" as Roy mentioned in describing how current penetrates the conductor less completelty due to inductance deeper in the wire. So, loss is greater at higher frequency due to reduced effective cross-section in the wire. Conversely, the loss with a given wire size gets lower as you go down in frequency. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy, W7EL wrote:
"Either you didn`t read the remainder of what I wrote, or I failed to explain it clearly." The fault was mine, not Roy`s. It is true that if you scale an antenna for half the frequency by doubling its length without increasing cross-section of the wire, its resistance increases. Resistance is rho(l/a) where rho is the resistivity, l is the length of the wire, and a is the area of the wire`s cross-section. Roy noted that lowering frequency by half means a wire twice as long which tends to double the wire`s resistance but skin effect increases penetration of the wire at the lower frequency. This reduces resistance by 1/sq.Rt.2. The same antenna using twice the length of the same wire but at half the frequency thus will have 1.414 times the effective resistance of the double frequency antenna. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Electric fence wire is aluminum, comes on 1/4 mile, 1/2 mile and mile rolls,
works great for ground radials but is to soft for antennas, IMHO. Best wire I have found for antennas is what the local phone co-op calls "field wire". They lay it down during the winter when they can not trench in a new copper line. In the spring they roll it up and toss it away after they trench in the new line. This stuff is 7 strands of steel, covered with a UV protective outer plastic shell. Stuff will last for years, stretch and return to shape, and if you bundle enough together you can pull a car out of the ditch in a pinch. Have had it up for years as a 40 and 80 meter dipole. Hard as the dickens to work with, almost impossible to solder, but, it makes a dipole even northeast Montana winters can not break, something to be said for that. Just my two cents worth. Sam |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
simple dipole for newbie - copper, alum, or galv steel pipe? | Scanner | |||
Loop Antennas / minijack works-clips don't / impedence?? | Shortwave | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
Workman BS-1 Dipole Antenna = Easy Mod to make it a Mini-Windom Antenna ! | Shortwave | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave |