Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:00:50 -0400, "Gerry"
wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message hlink.net... If an amateur had to relay a through a country and the amateurs didn't know each other language they still could have passed it by CW and the message could have been delivered to someone that could read it. Not no more. When things start failing communication wise worldwide, amateur radio might be all there is to relay messages, and the ITU just removed one of the legs of a three leg stool. The pro-code arguments seem to be getting sillier and sillier. I am a know-coder. I enjoy it. CW is my primary mode. I encourage others to join in. I do not believe for one minute that CW is going to save the world. I am not sure the FCC should be requiring it while not testing for the various digital modes or message handling - seems inconsistent SC Jerry, I am a 20 wpm extra and I used to agree with some of the things Slow Code was saying BUT, after all the BS he has created on the newsgroups I am starting to change my opinion. His constant bullcrap on here makes me sick. Its ok to state your opinion and move on but he has a real problem. I mean posting every day in rec.radio.swap for Christ sake. For someone so worried about people doing the right thing he is the worst example. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
ARRL 20 july, FCC Proposes to Drop Morse Code Requirement for All License Classes | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Eliminate the CW requirement for General & Extra, BUT THEN... | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |