Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "CW" wrote in message ups.com... Fellows, I've been wondering for some time now why amateur operators don't build their Yagi antenna's so they can be raised and lowered about 10ft in addition to being rotated. It seems to me that raising and lowering the height of a Yagi affects the take-off angle by at least several degrees, meaning that the signal delivery (target area) would be moved by at least many hundreds of miles. I don't know if this helps, but advice for TV DX says that you get progressively improved performance until the yagi's height-above-average-terrain (HAAT) is equal to about ten wavelengths. (Above that HAAT, the signal strength varies up and down with further increases in the elevation ) I never tested the idea, but if correct and it also holds for HF, there won't ever be anybody _lowering_ a HF yagi. We would want the most height. At the 2006 Field Day, one team had multi-band beam at 85 feet and everybody loved it. Before anybody tells me there is a difference between a yagi and a beam, let me thank you in advance. I cannot formulate a sensible distinction between them and I welcome the knowledge. I presume the terms are related but not interchangeable. 73 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Narrow lobe of a yagi | Antenna | |||
yagi boom question | Antenna | |||
900mhz yagi question | Scanner | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
Quad vs Yagi (or log) | Antenna |