Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
The bunched choke is the one that has a Fmax/Fmin frequency ratio of 6. A certain amount of mental gymnastics allowed you to claim that 1.5, 2.1 and 2.7 are all approximately equal to 2... so how about 6? It is a known fact that the VF of these chokes changes with frequency so they don't behave exactly like a transmission line. Bunching probably changes the VF considerably more than a helical wound choke since the first turn and last turn may be on top of each other. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Ian White GM3SEK wrote: The bunched choke is the one that has a Fmax/Fmin frequency ratio of 6. A certain amount of mental gymnastics allowed you to claim that 1.5, 2.1 and 2.7 are all approximately equal to 2... so how about 6? It is a known fact that the VF of these chokes changes with frequency so they don't behave exactly like a transmission line. Bunching probably changes the VF considerably more than a helical wound choke since the first turn and last turn may be on top of each other. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com I've never actually really compared bunching to helical wound. The one they specify to build for my triband yagi is a helical coil. On that antenna, I've used both methods, but not at the same time to really compare. I didn't notice any real noticable difference in operation though. I was just looking at the small choke in my trunk for 2m. It hangs from the trunk lid, and is tie wrapped. It was about 2-3 diameter, and about 4-5 turns or so, bunched together. For the purpose I used it for, it worked great. But it could well be possible what you say about the higher frequency operation. I do know a bunched choke is a whole lot better than no choke at all. ![]() MK MK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
I've never actually really compared bunching to helical wound. The one they specify to build for my triband yagi is a helical coil. On that antenna, I've used both methods, but not at the same time to really compare. I didn't notice any real noticable difference in operation though. You wouldn't notice much difference for a single band and maybe not even for a tribander. The helical has a greater bandwidth than the bunched. For instance, at: http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/airbalun.html there's an 8 turn helical Vs 8 turn bunched. If the target choking impedance is 500 ohms minimum, the helical covers 6-24 MHz, a 4:1 ratio, while the bunched covers 4-10 MHz, a 2.5:1 ratio. The helical also has about two times the maximum choking impedance as the bunched one. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
SkyWire Loop Antenna [Was: Wire loop.] Question | Shortwave | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave |