LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Report Post  
Old October 25th 06, 01:54 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default Hf Antenna Question - so what's the conclusion?

wrote:
Ian White (GM3SEK), Cecil Moore (W5DXP), and probably others have
discused HF chokes made from flat vs. bunched coils of coaxial cable,
but I must have missed some posting(s), for I haven't recognized
anything that looks like a CONCLUSION.


Ian and I agree that the ARRL was overly optimistic when
they asserted that a coiled coax choke can cover all three
octaves of HF.

The requirements for a choke feeding an
all-HF-band, ladder-line fed dipole are much higher than
the requirements for a choke feeding a resonant fan dipole.

* Is "bunched" or "flat" better?


Bunching disadvantage: Lowers the maximum choking impedance
and decreases the effective bandwidth. (Bunching increases
the stray capacitance.)

Bunching advantage?: Lowers the parallel self-resonant frequency
so not as many turns are required for narrow-band operation.

* Are they basically single-band or wide-band or somewhere in-between?


Depends upon the minimum required choking impedance. A 2:1 to
3:1 frequency range might be a good rule of thumb, e.g. one
choke can cover a tribander's 2:1 frequency range.

* Are there "rules of thumb" to make them for hams with
* No test equipment?
* A grid-dip meter?
* A noise bridge?
* An antenna analyzer?


How about: Using a 2L pop bottle as the coil form, don't use
more turns than the number of meters in a wavelength, e.g. no
more than 10 turns on 10 meters? That would probably work for
20m-6m as a rule of thumb.

The MFJ-259B will measure impedance up to 650 ohms. One could
define a "bandwidth" based on that 650 ohm value and knowledge
of a typical impedance waveform between those two points. For
instance, my 8 turn, 5.35" diameter choke falls below 650 ohms
at 4.63 MHz and 28.1 MHz. It might be useful over a 3:1 frequency
range from 40m-15m.
--
73, Cecil
http://www.w5dxp.com
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Optimising a G5RV Owen Duffy Antenna 20 October 3rd 06 06:38 PM
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] RHF Shortwave 0 December 27th 05 06:03 PM
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? RHF Shortwave 5 November 6th 05 04:52 AM
SkyWire Loop Antenna [Was: Wire loop.] Question RHF Shortwave 0 September 21st 05 10:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017