Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Ring wrote:
I would gladly pay double without a blink, and I doubt that it would be that much work, in the long run, to make a Linux version. Your SW and your call obviously, but you are making a very wrong assumption that porting a version that runs under a different OS takes nearly the same development effort. I would gladly assist in making it work. I have no idea what language it is written in, but as long as it is not in something MS specific it shouldn't be that hard to port. *Sigh*. I get this a lot. The main program, 70,000 lines of code at last count, is in Visual Basic 6 and incorporates many direct calls to the Windows API for speed and increased functionality. The calculating engines (a few tens of thousands of lines of code) and some main program routines are in Fortran, and make use of commercial math libraries for fast calculation of some complex functions. The Fortran routines also make a limited number of Windows API calls. The port of a functioning EZNEC program from DOS to Windows, back when EZNEC was somewhat smaller, took me about two years of full time work. After some short experiments with VB.NET, it looks like a port to that (Windows) language probably would take something like six months, plus an unknown amount of time to find and solve the huge number of subtle bugs caused by the port. But not only would the user not gain anything, there would actually be a negative impact, so I don't plan on doing it. Converting to a C Windows program would probably be a one or two year project. That might make it easier, although by no means simple, to port to Linux, but would be of no benefit to Windows users so the Linux market would have to pay for the effort. Sorry, you'd need to pay a lot more than twice the current price. (I happily run my EZNEC business for a fraction of what I can make doing consulting, but I don't work for nothing. Contrary to what seems like a common perception, I'm not retired but earn my living from EZNEC and consulting.) I encourage anyone who thinks it's a simple matter to develop a Linux program of the level of EZNEC to have at it. It's an untapped market. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Proper Phasing of two Andrew DB224 Antennas | Antenna | |||
Phasing verticals | Antenna | |||
Does phasing verticals work better than dipole? | Antenna | |||
Want K2BT "Ham Radio" articles on phasing verticals | Antenna | |||
phasing coils | Antenna |