Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
Hi Roy, Sorry about making such a mess. That tar is really hard to clean up. FYI, I was referring mostly to Sevick's 4th edition of Transmission Line Transformers, published in 2001. As you mention, he has undergone a considerable transformation (pun intended) since his earliest books. I'm glad to hear that. The first edition sold a lot of copies and contained a lot of misinformation. The second was better, and hopefully undid a little of the damage the first did. Maybe the net result was neutral by the time the fourth was published. Sevick does indeed recommend a two-core approach for a 4:1 Guanella balun if the load side is not balanced. That's one of those improvements over the first and second editions. As you know, he generally avoids the use of the terms "current balun" and "voltage balun". Yes, I think that's mostly because they're the terms I coined and used. My question still holds, however. In a typical situation the "balanced" side, generally the antenna, is only partially unbalanced, not simply shorted to ground on one side. In this generic case would you expect the single core Guanella balun to perform poorly with slight or modest imbalance? I'm sorrry, I don't know, because I haven't looked carefully at his "Guanella" balun to see if it's a current balun, voltage balun, or something in between. As I pointed out in my balun article many years ago, if an antenna is perfectly symmetrical, voltage and current baluns perform equally. If it isn't, the voltage balun can make things even worse. If both sides of the transformer are completely unbalanced it is not clear why one would expect a balun of any type to be useful. What is needed in that case is impedance transformation, not balancing. Have you read the article at http://eznec.com/Amateur/Articles/Baluns.pdf? If you have but still think that, then I certainly failed to communicate. For the benefit of readers who have read the article, I didn't mention a second source of imbalance: mutual coupling to the antenna. This can occur if the feedline isn't run completely symmetrically relative to the antenna. And, interestingly, there are situations where this is occurring that inserting a balun can actually increase the common mode current. That's a story for another article some day. But first I've got to somehow get people to read the first one. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transfer Impedance(LONG) | Shortwave | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
Yet another BALUN questions | Antenna | |||
Choke Balun Impedance Recommendations? | Antenna | |||
Make your own T2FD | Shortwave |