|
kookathon
Slow Code wrote:
Paul W. Schleck wrote in : In .com writes: 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU Good luck with it Paul. I look forward to seeing Markie, Lloydie, Woger, Todd, Steve, Brian, Lenny, U-Know-Who, John, Robert, Jimmie, Scott and all CW test haters and lazy asses put in the dumpster. likely by then the test will be history but why would imagine it it willstop and the rest from posting IF pauls ssytem shuts down one side then the NG will die It will make usenet a much better place. why? And a real hams can save ham radio from the dumb it downers. real Hams have trying to save radio from the dumbed down code welfare type like yourself Thanks, 73 de Slow Code |
Laziness is no reason to destroy quality radio.
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in
ups.com: Slow Code wrote: Paul W. Schleck wrote in : In .com writes: Where is Paul Schleck these days? Here it is 1 December and his "threatening" troika of "moderators" haven't yet appeared. I wonder if he has been appointed to a new cabinet post? You know, the "Department of Hamland Security"... :-) Holiday regards, LA The member of our team that is finishing the final draft of the Request for Discussion (RFD) agreed to a firm deadline of January 1, 2007. The team has reviewed, and agreed to, prior working drafts of the RFD, as well as submission guidelines for the proposed new newsgroup, so this is just cleanup and tweaking at this point. The submission guidelines were recently posted to misc.test.moderated. We will have an RFD to pass along to the news.announce.newsgroups moderator to crosspost to this newsgroup shortly after January 1st. Moving the discussion period to after Christmas is also desirable in order to have a bigger audience for the RFD, and give everyone ample opportunity to provide feedback free of holiday distractions and time demands. In the meantime, we've been testing the robomoderation software, Secure Team-Based Usenet Moderation Program (STUMP). Several rec.radio.amateur.policy participants have graciously agreed to send us test submissions, many of which we have approved and posted to misc.test.moderated. At this point, anyone reading this newsgroup is welcome to send us test postings. Send such submissions to: We'll process them as if they were actual submissions to the proposed moderated newsgroup. Anything we approve will be posted to misc.test.moderated, so please don't send anything to that address that you don't want posted to Usenet, or at least add the text "not for publication" or "do not approve." We would be particularly interested in test postings that are PGP signed. Watch this space for further information after the first of the year. -- 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU Good luck with it Paul. I look forward to seeing Markie, Lloydie, Woger, ...and all CW test haters and lazy asses put in the dumpster. Hey, dumb****, Roger passed 13 wpm CW for his General. Why don't you know what the **** youare talking about before you run your uninformed fat yap? Shut up, stupid. SC |
Laziness is no reason to destroy quality radio.
Paul W. Schleck wrote: In .com writes: Where is Paul Schleck these days? Here it is 1 December and his "threatening" troika of "moderators" haven't yet appeared. I wonder if he has been appointed to a new cabinet post? You know, the "Department of Hamland Security"... :-) Holiday regards, LA The member of our team that is finishing the final draft of the Request for Discussion (RFD) agreed to a firm deadline of January 1, 2007. The team has reviewed, and agreed to, prior working drafts of the RFD, as well as submission guidelines for the proposed new newsgroup, so this is just cleanup and tweaking at this point. The submission guidelines were recently posted to misc.test.moderated. We will have an RFD to pass along to the news.announce.newsgroups moderator to crosspost to this newsgroup shortly after January 1st. Moving the discussion period to after Christmas is also desirable in order to have a bigger audience for the RFD, and give everyone ample opportunity to provide feedback free of holiday distractions and time demands. In the meantime, we've been testing the robomoderation software, Secure Team-Based Usenet Moderation Program (STUMP). Several rec.radio.amateur.policy participants have graciously agreed to send us test submissions, many of which we have approved and posted to misc.test.moderated. At this point, anyone reading this newsgroup is welcome to send us test postings. Send such submissions to: We'll process them as if they were actual submissions to the proposed moderated newsgroup. Anything we approve will be posted to misc.test.moderated, so please don't send anything to that address that you don't want posted to Usenet, or at least add the text "not for publication" or "do not approve." We would be particularly interested in test postings that are PGP signed. Watch this space for further information after the first of the year. -- 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/ Finger for PGP Public Key Thank you for the prompt reply. LA |
Laziness is no reason to destroy quality radio.
Slow Code wrote: "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in ups.com: Slow Code wrote: Paul W. Schleck wrote in : In .com writes: Where is Paul Schleck these days? Here it is 1 December and his "threatening" troika of "moderators" haven't yet appeared. I wonder if he has been appointed to a new cabinet post? You know, the "Department of Hamland Security"... :-) Holiday regards, LA The member of our team that is finishing the final draft of the Request for Discussion (RFD) agreed to a firm deadline of January 1, 2007. The team has reviewed, and agreed to, prior working drafts of the RFD, as well as submission guidelines for the proposed new newsgroup, so this is just cleanup and tweaking at this point. The submission guidelines were recently posted to misc.test.moderated. We will have an RFD to pass along to the news.announce.newsgroups moderator to crosspost to this newsgroup shortly after January 1st. Moving the discussion period to after Christmas is also desirable in order to have a bigger audience for the RFD, and give everyone ample opportunity to provide feedback free of holiday distractions and time demands. In the meantime, we've been testing the robomoderation software, Secure Team-Based Usenet Moderation Program (STUMP). Several rec.radio.amateur.policy participants have graciously agreed to send us test submissions, many of which we have approved and posted to misc.test.moderated. At this point, anyone reading this newsgroup is welcome to send us test postings. Send such submissions to: We'll process them as if they were actual submissions to the proposed moderated newsgroup. Anything we approve will be posted to misc.test.moderated, so please don't send anything to that address that you don't want posted to Usenet, or at least add the text "not for publication" or "do not approve." We would be particularly interested in test postings that are PGP signed. Watch this space for further information after the first of the year. -- 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU Good luck with it Paul. I look forward to seeing Markie, Lloydie, Woger, ...and all CW test haters and lazy asses put in the dumpster. Hey, dumb****, Roger passed 13 wpm CW for his General. Why don't you know what the **** youare talking about before you run your uninformed fat yap? Shut up, stupid. What's the matter, Sniveling ****, one more of your lies is exposed? Are you going to pound your cheapassed computer desk? |
Laziness is no reason to destroy quality radio.
|
Laziness is no reason to destroy quality radio.
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message ups.com... Slow Code wrote: "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in ups.com: Slow Code wrote: Paul W. Schleck wrote in : In .com writes: Where is Paul Schleck these days? Here it is 1 December and his "threatening" troika of "moderators" haven't yet appeared. I wonder if he has been appointed to a new cabinet post? You know, the "Department of Hamland Security"... :-) Holiday regards, LA The member of our team that is finishing the final draft of the Request for Discussion (RFD) agreed to a firm deadline of January 1, 2007. The team has reviewed, and agreed to, prior working drafts of the RFD, as well as submission guidelines for the proposed new newsgroup, so this is just cleanup and tweaking at this point. The submission guidelines were recently posted to misc.test.moderated. We will have an RFD to pass along to the news.announce.newsgroups moderator to crosspost to this newsgroup shortly after January 1st. Moving the discussion period to after Christmas is also desirable in order to have a bigger audience for the RFD, and give everyone ample opportunity to provide feedback free of holiday distractions and time demands. In the meantime, we've been testing the robomoderation software, Secure Team-Based Usenet Moderation Program (STUMP). Several rec.radio.amateur.policy participants have graciously agreed to send us test submissions, many of which we have approved and posted to misc.test.moderated. At this point, anyone reading this newsgroup is welcome to send us test postings. Send such submissions to: We'll process them as if they were actual submissions to the proposed moderated newsgroup. Anything we approve will be posted to misc.test.moderated, so please don't send anything to that address that you don't want posted to Usenet, or at least add the text "not for publication" or "do not approve." We would be particularly interested in test postings that are PGP signed. Watch this space for further information after the first of the year. -- 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU Good luck with it Paul. I look forward to seeing Markie, Lloydie, Woger, ...and all CW test haters and lazy asses put in the dumpster. Hey, dumb****, Roger passed 13 wpm CW for his General. Why don't you know what the **** youare talking about before you run your uninformed fat yap? Shut up, stupid. What's the matter, Sniveling ****, one more of your lies is exposed? Are you going to pound your cheapassed computer desk? No but I think I will pound my pud to some more hot gay porn! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com