Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since things are a little slow here...
As I continue to experiment with my 28 foot vertical I attempted to try a shunt feed today. It totally escapes me how I might model it with EZNEC 4 but I do have an MFJ-269 to work with. I set up the radials and tied them to the base of the vertical. I moved up the vertical from the bottom 55 inches. No real reason, that is the length of wire I had handy I fed the wire with the MFJ 269 with the coax shield on the ground side. What I expected to see was some thing resonant between 6-8 mhz with a lot of reactance and who knows resistance. It did not happen.... What I did see was a resonance at 23 mhz with Rs= 48 and Xs=5 for a 1.1 SWR! Dabbling with EZNEC seems to suggest there may be something happening like a 5/8 wave radiator but many factors had to be forced into place. So that leads to my question: How do you shunt feed a 28 foot vertical? John Ferrell W8CCW |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:24:07 -0500, John Ferrell
wrote: What I expected to see was some thing resonant between 6-8 mhz with a lot of reactance and who knows resistance. It did not happen.... I don't really understand that, what is resonance, and why would there then be lots of reactance? Owen -- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:25:45 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:24:07 -0500, John Ferrell wrote: What I expected to see was some thing resonant between 6-8 mhz with a lot of reactance and who knows resistance. It did not happen.... I don't really understand that, what is resonance, and why would there then be lots of reactance? Owen I expected a dip in the swr at the 1/4 wave length but not a 50 ohm match. John Ferrell W8CCW |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:06:21 -0500, John Ferrell
wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:25:45 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:24:07 -0500, John Ferrell wrote: What I expected to see was some thing resonant between 6-8 mhz with a lot of reactance and who knows resistance. It did not happen.... I don't really understand that, what is resonance, and why would there then be lots of reactance? Owen I expected a dip in the swr at the 1/4 wave length but not a 50 ohm match. John, Your terminology has me confused. When you say you expect to see resonance between 6-8MHz, I understand resonance to mean zero reactance at that frequency. Then you tell us you expect to see lots of reactance. They are inconsistent. Then you tell me that you expect to see a dip in SWR at the 1/4 wave length. I am guessing, but I think you probably mean the frequency where the vertical is a quarter wavelength long electrically. If you drive the vertical at the base in series, you would expect to observe resonance (ie no reactance) somewhere around the quarter wave frequency. If you shunt feed it further up, the shunt feeding arrangement acts as an impedance transformer, and it is unlikely that you will see zero reactance (ie resonance) at the same frequency as if you series fed the vertical at the base. A feature of shunt feeding typically is that it is reactive, and you have to tune out the reactance, adjusting the tap point up or down to get the desired feed impedance. Owen -- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey John... Glad to see you are still experimenting with the
vertical... One answer is that you are shunt feeding a vertical monopole near it's third harmonic tapped at about 1/8 wave above ground... Depending upon shunt spacing and the diameter ratios it looks like you found the magic spot for that frequency to transform to nearly a 1:1 match... As one fella said to me long ago, I would rather be lucky than good, any day... denny - k8do |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Nov 2006 05:36:12 -0800, "Denny" wrote:
Hey John... Glad to see you are still experimenting with the vertical... One answer is that you are shunt feeding a vertical monopole near it's third harmonic tapped at about 1/8 wave above ground... Depending upon shunt spacing and the diameter ratios it looks like you found the magic spot for that frequency to transform to nearly a 1:1 match... As one fella said to me long ago, I would rather be lucky than good, any day... denny - k8do Stumbling across that condition has added to my confusion! My dumb questions should show that the 28 foot stick still has lots to teach me. I am beginning to get a little impatient to move on to a permanent radial system and a taller antenna. Shunt feeding would simplify lightning protection and physical mounting considerations of a taller stick. John Ferrell W8CCW |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:43:14 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:
John, Your terminology has me confused. When you say you expect to see resonance between 6-8MHz, I understand resonance to mean zero reactance at that frequency. Then you tell us you expect to see lots of reactance. They are inconsistent. Then you tell me that you expect to see a dip in SWR at the 1/4 wave length. I am guessing, but I think you probably mean the frequency where the vertical is a quarter wavelength long electrically. If you drive the vertical at the base in series, you would expect to observe resonance (ie no reactance) somewhere around the quarter wave frequency. If you shunt feed it further up, the shunt feeding arrangement acts as an impedance transformer, and it is unlikely that you will see zero reactance (ie resonance) at the same frequency as if you series fed the vertical at the base. A feature of shunt feeding typically is that it is reactive, and you have to tune out the reactance, adjusting the tap point up or down to get the desired feed impedance. Owen Sorry for the confusing terminology but I am confused! The testing I have done so far with this 28 foot antenna has been series fed. The results obtained have been consistant with the Eznec models. I believe my current direction requires I puzzle out the Gamma match in Eznec. John Ferrell W8CCW |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:31:01 -0500, John Ferrell
wrote: Sorry for the confusing terminology but I am confused! John, For the moment, forget the term resonance, what it means, what is resonant, and the importance or not of resonance. Just make you objective a feedpoint Z = 50+j0. The testing I have done so far with this 28 foot antenna has been series fed. The results obtained have been consistant with the Eznec models. Ok, I assume that means YOU have created and run the NEC models. So now model the gamma match, initially with zero capacitance. The diameters of the gamma arm and and the driven element, and spacing are critical parameters, change them until you have the desired feedpoint R. Then insert a capacitor at the feedpoint to offset the inductive reactance in the feedpoint Z. Then build it, and see if you can't make it work. I believe my current direction requires I puzzle out the Gamma match in Eznec. That is probably a lot easier than suck it and see experiments. Owen PS: When you have done all that and it works, go back to thinking about resonance, and take a system view. In EZNEC you could explore a solution for the same operating frequency with a shorter vertical, say 25', design the gamma match for a 50+j0 feedpoint, compare the gain to the longer model and answer the question of whether natural resonance of the driven element alone (ie without the gamma arm) is critically important to performance of the antenna system. -- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Ferrell wrote:
Dabbling with EZNEC seems to suggest there may be something happening like a 5/8 wave radiator but many factors had to be forced into place. So that leads to my question: How do you shunt feed a 28 foot vertical? If you feed it at zero feet, you get a feedpoint impedance of zero. At the frequency at which the radiator is resonant, i.e. about 234/28 = ~8.4 MHz, the feedpoint resistance will increase as you raise the feedpoint. Somewhere on the way up, it will be 50 ohms with some inductive reactance so you need a series capacitor. It's a Gamma feed. It is easy to model with EZNEC. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:33:43 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: John Ferrell wrote: Dabbling with EZNEC seems to suggest there may be something happening like a 5/8 wave radiator but many factors had to be forced into place. So that leads to my question: How do you shunt feed a 28 foot vertical? If you feed it at zero feet, you get a feedpoint impedance of zero. At the frequency at which the radiator is resonant, i.e. about 234/28 = ~8.4 MHz, the feedpoint resistance will increase as you raise the feedpoint. Somewhere on the way up, it will be 50 ohms with some inductive reactance so you need a series capacitor. It's a Gamma feed. It is easy to model with EZNEC. I will go back to EZNEC 4 and see if I can determine what I am missing on the Gamma match. John Ferrell W8CCW |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|