| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
art wrote:
There again maybe it is best that you be honest and say you don't understand! Better that than join those who have nothing to say about antennas! Interesting, but you cannot argue with decibels, and the yagi is more efficient that a dipole without reflector and director, at least at capturing signal. However, while I can picture the reflector acting as a mirror (and to some extent, this can be "proven", make the reflector a sheet and see how much signal is radiated to the other side, away from the driven element. But, that darn director has always bothered me, I see it acting more as a "magnifying glass to rf" than absorbing the signal and re-radiating it to the de, or absorbing the signal and coupling it to the de via magnetic or capactive means... one more bit of a puzzle which gives me visions of the ether (which some say is caused by evil spirits and/or the drugs I did in college (I don't think the beer hurt anything!)) But, with his calculator in hand, I know cecil will take this head on... JS |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Yagi efficiency | Antenna | |||
| Yagi efficiency | Antenna | |||
| Tape Measure Yagi Antenna Questions | Antenna | |||
| SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
| Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||