Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ofcourse they are.They are both resonant and have the same "Q" which is
equivalent to half power. Isnt that why we talk of a half power width of a main beam because of the assertion I just made. This is a excellent candidate for a complex circuit analysis since the Q is the same regardles of movement away from the resonant frequency and coupling is not a factor! Art Art Cecil Moore wrote: art wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Actually Art, adding reactance reduces the current in the element thus *decreasing* losses below what a resonant passive element would have. Pure reactance is lossless. This current that you are referring to, I used P =I squared R which leads to lower power. Where did I go wrong Lower power results in lowering the loss due to heat. That leaves more power available to be radiated by the antenna system but not necessarily radiated by this single element that we are discussing. I suspect two driven elements are theoretically capable of better performance than a two element Yagi given equal total power input into the elements. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yagi efficiency | Antenna | |||
Yagi efficiency | Antenna | |||
Tape Measure Yagi Antenna Questions | Antenna | |||
SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna |