Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny" wrote in message ups.com... Well, there are dielectrics and there are . . . ummm well you get the point... In this case the main dielectric of my condensers is glass, probably stannous float bath soda glass... 0.100" thick with an aluminum plate on each side... After my fingers had found the disparate temperature rise on an early test I did a literature search for the dielectric constant and loss factor of glass and discovered that not all glass is equal - or as Orwell put it, some of the animals are more equal than the others... Anyway, Soda glass has a loss tangent of 0.01 to 0.05 and a dielectric constant of 6 - and Borosilicate glass (Pyrex) has a loss tangent of 0.001 to 0.002 and a dielectric constant of 4... So, it would appear that Borosilicate glass is better as a low loss dielectric... The trade off is that with 1/3 lower Dielectric Constant I would have to increase my plate areas by 1/3 to maintain the same capacity... The jury is out on this... 3.5 mc is relatively low frequency... I am not sure how much of the heating is due to the loss factor of the glass and how much is I2R heating from the current flowing across the plates... I spoze I could order some custom made 8" X 10" X 0.100" Pyrex plates and compare otherwise identical condensers... OTOH, I spoze some of the more equal animals in my house would complain over sticks and stones in their xmas stockings after I pay for the Pyrex... denny / k8do Could you use some Pyrex disk, I think I have some that are about a foot in diameter. If I can find them they are yours for the postage. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Coax Losses ? | Antenna | |||
Determining SWR and Transmission Line Losses | Antenna | |||
Additional Line Losses Due to SWR | Antenna | |||
Losses in PI-filter output | Antenna |