| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dan, all of that is in the PTO application which I have held back on
because of all the nasty comments I got from the experts before I lift a finger. When I last explained a patented idea I has some time ago stones were coming from all directions from those who thought of me as a person who thinks outside the box must be looney. When I first starterd to turn the subject around to this new aproach for radiating antennas the harping started not only from those without a contribution but also from experts that are much wiser than I with repect to radiation. This time whether thru hell or high water I am going to explain it in the simplest way possible because I know that there are some hams throwing stones who haven't got the faintest idea about radiation other than arranging elements in spear shape fashion and point it where you want. Now I will tell you something, this aproach works out using a antenna program that is related but not the same as standard formd i.e. AO professional. A separate individual took my figures and applied them to the NEC4 program which is more universally accepted and where it validated my findings. Ofcourse nI could have used the computor program incorrectly so I dug into the books to find what I thought constituted a reasonable mathematical sequence to explain what I found. Ofcourse By doing this I am opening myself to a lot of name calling because over the years it has been assumed that everything about antennas was known and the Yaqgi was king. Well I look at things differently like looking at the cutting room floor to see what was discarded by the producers even tho they are clips from experts. I then take hold of these clips to try to get into the minds of those who produced them and by learning this I apply there work where the producer didn't. So In a way I am trying to duplicate the originators mind and take things to the next step which is sometimes called thinking outside the box since the text is unwritten and one is not learning by rote....I might aded that I offered all this to RADCOM of England of which I am a member..........didn't see the light of day so it can still prove to be a gastly idea from a blithering idiot ..UMMMM enough said wrote: Art, You'd get a lot more people who would be able to listen to what you're saying if you drew a picture and posted it somewhere. Dan |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
| Shortwave Listener (SWL) Newbee Question - Is My Dipole Antenna Set-Up Right ? | Shortwave | |||
| Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
| The "Almost" Delta Loop Antenna for Limited Space Shortwave Listening (SWL) made from TV 'type' Parts | Shortwave | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||