Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
O.K. I have a few minuits before I start my day so I will use it to
describe in more detail that word "curl" that I spoke about earlier where we just added a straight line arrow to the enclosed charges and yet we called it a "curl". Remembe we only applied a time varing field for just a moment so the arbitary border would not breach and this movement can be likened ti a corkscrew that turns around and around but yet it eneters just one small hole. If we view a charge of being on the surface of the corkscrew we can visulise it going round and round like a stone in Davids sling. But we only supplied energy to the gaussian fiels for a short moment and David who also stopped the stone in the sling flew outwards in a straight line with its potential energy changing to kinetic energy. So that is why the charges had an arrow attached which is what appears when the charge whirles around with phase changes until it is released , so tho we represented the "curl" addition by a straight arrow or vector one can see that this is a result of the curling action of the charge around a dipole when a time varying field is applied. Remember this particular addition to Gausses law provides the means of connection to Ampere and Kirchoffs work that evolved with electromagnetics. Next time I will explain how a law of nature allowed us to move out of the electrostics sphere and move towards the creation of a radiating field. Hope that helps without confusion. O.K. where was I Ah, we now have in front of us where all the enclosed charges are of a like sign. So now visualise that you are looking at a cluster of could be radiating elements side on and think that each charge that appears on the surface of the enclosed border eminated somehow from a dipole behind it First thing to understand that behind the charge direction sign we have a dipole which like all the other charges must be in equilibrium with all the other charges dipoles so the first requirement is to make every dipole resonant and since they are in cluster form the interacting coupling effects destroy the equilibrium unless we ensure that all the dipoles are resonant despite outher forces. To do this we ofcourse have to adjust the lengths of each dipole such that it is still resonant despite the positional arrangement we put them in which means the dipooles will not be of the same length but still reonant in situ to maiantain equilibrium. Up to now we have beenmanipulating a Gaussion law that applies to electrostatics, a subset of electro magnetics where in mathematical terms time must be taken into account so we have to go back to the Gaussian field and add another tem to the Gaussian law like " in a small space of time " or something like that. We can do this because what Gauss found and put into mathematical form is a law not a theorem in that it blends with laws of nature and the universe as proven mathematically. So for an instant of time we can place the clustered elements in a short burst of a time varying field where each of the enclosed charges have a directional vector added to it in the form of phase possesion which is often times referred to as Curl if you come across that term later. Now for equilibrium all charges must change in unison which they will do as we made the length of elements resonant in situ. Now looking at the Gaussian field it can be seen that for a short moment in time each of the charges/dipole elements have formed directional mean for the time varying charges but without breaking out from the arbitary border or having to radiate in any way to another element. So at this point we have a cluster of elements that have not started the process of radiating/E.H. field generation and where by virtue of all elements being of the same "Q' we have avoided the cumbersome job of determining the intercoupling forces. At this point we can say we are dealing with lumped constants and eligable for adaptation by RLC or complex circuitry methods. I think you will need a bit of time to absorb what I have stated before we move on to an actual radiating array since there is more work to be done before I get to that point.See you later art wrote: Pray tell me what is it in my posting that inflamed you as a self chosen judge to pass judgement on me? Mike Lucas wrote: "art" wrote in message ps.com... massive snip Art: Do you know what a blithering idiot is??? Well, you're starting to blither pretty often. Mike W5CHR Memphis |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Newbee Question - Is My Dipole Antenna Set-Up Right ? | Shortwave | |||
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
The "Almost" Delta Loop Antenna for Limited Space Shortwave Listening (SWL) made from TV 'type' Parts | Shortwave | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna |