Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Followon to image theory
Richard Clark wrote:
p.s. For the purpose of the original posting of "image theory:" There is a fundamental error in separating the parts from the whole, the mistake of atomizing what should not be atomized. That's the point I was trying to make. One cannot correctly say "the radials are a reflector" or "the radials are non- radiating". The radials are partially reflecting, partially absorbing, partially radiating, and partially non-radiating based on a level of probability for each of the possible events which are not necessarily limited to those four events. It's not a 100% either/or situation. The original mirror Vs radiation "argument" between the authors is like arguing whether gray is black or white. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
balun and image | Shortwave | |||
A "single conversion" question | Shortwave | |||
And Incase Lennie Doubted that MARS and Amateur Radio are a "Service to the Nation..." MARS Chief Says Otherwise | Policy | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment |