Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
chuck wrote:
What is elusive is how the charges get changed into a detectable signal. Yes, there's a broad range of possible explanations. One interesting theory is that uncharged particles rubbing against an uncharged antenna results in a triboelectric effect that, after contact, leaves the antenna and particles with opposite charges. You might call it the relativity theory of charged particles. :-) Will you tell me again how we know that non-coronal p-static exists? By definition, corona requires ionization of the air which requires a certain current through the air, i.e. at least a small arc. The question is, can p-static exist and be heard below the corona threshold? In 1939, another C. Moore, W9LZX, solved the corona problem at HCJB in Quito, Ecuador by inventing the cubical quad antenna. Describing the problem with the Yagi beam: "Gigantic corona discharges sprang full- blown from the tips of the driven element and directors, standing out in mid-air and burning with a wicked hiss and crackle. The heavy industrial aluminum tubing used for the elements of the doomed beam glowed with the heat of the arc and turned incandescent at the tips. Large molten chunks of aluminum dropped to the ground as the inexorable fire slowly consumed the antenna. The corona discharges were so loud and so intense that they could be seen and heard singing and burning a quarter- mile away from the station." So Clarence Moore invented the cubical quad to solve the corona problem. One must admit that the cubical quad at least reduced the corona problem by many magnitudes during transmit. One must also admit that the corona problem during receive is magnitudes below the problem during transmit. At some level, the air ceases to be ionized and corona ceases to exist, by definition. What can we conclude by applying the principle of antenna transmit/receive reciprocity? Comparing the Yagi to the cubical quad is similar to comparing a single-wire 1/2WL dipole to a full-wave loop. The ground referenced loop with its rounded corners certainly reduces the corona threshold level. It is possible that the loop is quieter *because* it is below the corona threshold and the single-wire dipole is not. Can we hear p-static on a full-wave loop? Yes, I have heard it on a clear-sky, low-humidity, windy day in the Arizona desert. Did it occur without ionization of the air? There probably were no points (pun intended) in the system conducive to corona discharge. Obviously a qualitative argument rather than a quantitative one but possibly valid nonetheless based on the Quito experience. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Tilt ? - The Terminated Tilted Folded Dipole (TTFD / T2FD) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
T2FD antenna opinions solicited | Shortwave | |||
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Top-loaded folded monopole? | Antenna | |||
String up folded dipoles for FM? | Antenna |