Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
i have a feeling that what you will find is that the individual charges on drops, flakes, and dust is too small to be detected by a normal amateur receiver. However, the electric field that must accompany them is what generates the corona effects that can be heard. Just think about it, how do small particles get charged without also generating a larger bulk field? The effect that charges the particles, be it dry friction from wind on dust, or freezing and convection in clouds (any cloud, not just those with enough charge to generate lightning) is not an individual particle effect, it happens to many, many particles at once which cumulatively create a much larger electric field than any one of them alone could create. And while the charge transfer of small drops striking a conductor may not be enough to stimulate a receiver the corona caused by the accumulated field over the whole height of the structure can be significant. Charges can be accumulated on objects so as to produce a corona breakdown in many ways. I think this is one of our fundamental starting points and hopefully, was never in question. The separation of charges can be accomplished by a variety of techniques, not all well-understood. A moving cloud of charged particles can induce very large charges into a grounded conductor. A sufficient concentration of charge at pointed components of the conductor will produce a corona. The corona plainly radiates "noise" that is detected by our receivers. There is less certainty about whether an ungrounded conductor (say, an unattached wire) can be made to produce a corona via electrostatic induction. As I wrote in an earlier post in this thread, an ungrounded conductor cannot be charged by an external field, but the distribution of charges preexisting on the conductor can be affected by the field, perhaps causing coronal discharges. I recall writing that uneven discharges of the positive and negative "ends" of the conductor could even leave the conductor with a net charge. Your points are good ones, Dave, and worth keeping in mind. 73, Chuck ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Tilt ? - The Terminated Tilted Folded Dipole (TTFD / T2FD) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
T2FD antenna opinions solicited | Shortwave | |||
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Top-loaded folded monopole? | Antenna | |||
String up folded dipoles for FM? | Antenna |