Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
CW wrote: They are breaking the law, yes but I see a bit of distinction here between these people and common criminals. The criminal actively commits an illegal act. These people retaining their firearms did not commit any act. They were declared criminals without any action of their own. There are crimes of commission and crimes of omission. If a law requires action of law-abiding citizens, then inaction is a crime. The Canadian gun laws caused the crime rate in Canada to skyrocket. So if your government ordered ALL firearms surrendered to the local authority, would you label those who peacefully choose not to comply as criminals, or libertarians trying to retain freedom for their country's free citizens? What would "First Freedom" write about them? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HAM EQUIPMENT DONATIONS NEEDED | Antenna | |||
DONATIONS NEEDED | Antenna | |||
AMATEUR RADIO GEAR WANTED | Antenna | |||
AMATEUR RADIO EQUIPMENT WANTED | Antenna | |||
Amateur Radio Legal Issues List | Antenna |