Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 28th 06, 11:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 42
Default Gaussian law and time varying fields


"art" wrote in message
oups.com...

Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab

insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own statue
within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with respect
to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow
your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated.
So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the
possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any
program of you choice?
I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust
because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults
that have no grounding so I give up and will submit.
I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only
talked and for what reason?


Further snip of rant

Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be
helping,
rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself, as
many of us lurkers
find this thread of considerable entertainment value.

Mike W5CHR


  #2   Report Post  
Old December 28th 06, 11:50 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 797
Default Gaussian law and time varying fields


"Mike Lucas" wrote in message
. ..

"art" wrote in message
oups.com...

Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab

insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own
statue
within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with
respect
to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow
your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated.
So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the
possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any
program of you choice?
I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust
because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults
that have no grounding so I give up and will submit.
I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only
talked and for what reason?


Further snip of rant

Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be
helping,
rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself,
as many of us lurkers
find this thread of considerable entertainment value.

Mike W5CHR


then you better get in here and contribute, I've got better things to do
this weekend than argue with a lost cause. he's not even that much fun, its
deteriorating into personal attacks instead of trying to explain his
erroneous theories.


  #3   Report Post  
Old December 29th 06, 12:17 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Gaussian law and time varying fields

David
Calm down,
the die has been cast
and people know that you had the chance but not the education to take
part in it.
This newsgroup is for debate and you were the one to take up the axe
but when put to the test failed to show up.
I think people will wonder why you ran away after all that talking,
and you keep coming back at me for some reason.

You must admit that others who are reading this are wondering why you
deiced not to put me into the middle ages, there wasn't any conditions
imposed not one and you talked about all the experience you have with
different programs anbd because I didn't pose any conditions fell back
on the notion or position that the programs are no good unless you know
what you are doing.
Yet you try to tell me you are knoweledgable about programs. David it
would be better if you got off my back and hope that people will forget
your postering and what happened when you were
challenged...........sad.......sad......sad

but help is comming a newcomer just joined in, he may be the one who
will take your place, he may be an antenna expert in disguise.....
a few days will tell

With sympathy
Art KB9MZ........XG
yes I am english born, what are you going to make of that if you are
looking for something?



Dave wrote:
"Mike Lucas" wrote in message
. ..

"art" wrote in message
oups.com...

Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab

insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own
statue
within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with
respect
to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow
your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated.
So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the
possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any
program of you choice?
I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust
because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults
that have no grounding so I give up and will submit.
I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only
talked and for what reason?


Further snip of rant

Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be
helping,
rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself,
as many of us lurkers
find this thread of considerable entertainment value.

Mike W5CHR


then you better get in here and contribute, I've got better things to do
this weekend than argue with a lost cause. he's not even that much fun, its
deteriorating into personal attacks instead of trying to explain his
erroneous theories.


  #4   Report Post  
Old December 29th 06, 12:17 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Gaussian law and time varying fields

David
Calm down,
the die has been cast
and people know that you had the chance but not the education to take
part in it.
This newsgroup is for debate and you were the one to take up the axe
but when put to the test failed to show up.
I think people will wonder why you ran away after all that talking,
and you keep coming back at me for some reason.

You must admit that others who are reading this are wondering why you
deiced not to put me into the middle ages, there wasn't any conditions
imposed not one and you talked about all the experience you have with
different programs anbd because I didn't pose any conditions fell back
on the notion or position that the programs are no good unless you know
what you are doing.
Yet you try to tell me you are knoweledgable about programs. David it
would be better if you got off my back and hope that people will forget
your postering and what happened when you were
challenged...........sad.......sad......sad

but help is comming a newcomer just joined in, he may be the one who
will take your place, he may be an antenna expert in disguise.....
a few days will tell

With sympathy
Art KB9MZ........XG
yes I am english born, what are you going to make of that if you are
looking for something?



Dave wrote:
"Mike Lucas" wrote in message
. ..

"art" wrote in message
oups.com...

Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab

insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own
statue
within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with
respect
to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow
your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated.
So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the
possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any
program of you choice?
I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust
because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults
that have no grounding so I give up and will submit.
I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only
talked and for what reason?


Further snip of rant

Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be
helping,
rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself,
as many of us lurkers
find this thread of considerable entertainment value.

Mike W5CHR


then you better get in here and contribute, I've got better things to do
this weekend than argue with a lost cause. he's not even that much fun, its
deteriorating into personal attacks instead of trying to explain his
erroneous theories.


  #5   Report Post  
Old December 29th 06, 12:22 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Gaussian law and time varying fields

Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade

Art


Mike Lucas wrote:
"art" wrote in message
oups.com...

Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab

insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own statue
within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with respect
to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow
your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated.
So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the
possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any
program of you choice?
I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust
because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults
that have no grounding so I give up and will submit.
I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only
talked and for what reason?


Further snip of rant

Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be
helping,
rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself, as
many of us lurkers
find this thread of considerable entertainment value.

Mike W5CHR




  #6   Report Post  
Old December 29th 06, 02:50 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 757
Default Gaussian law and time varying fields


art wrote:
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade

Art


How can we miss it with the multi-postings? But in order for *you*
to see the charade, I'm afraid a mirror will be needed.
You **** and whine because no one can understand the silly
jibber jabber you throw out...
You **** and whine because no one will try to do or repeat work *you*
should be doing, or already have done.
The solution to your problem is actually very simple, and Dave has
already
given it to you. Build the dang thing and see if it works as you say
on an antenna range.
If it works as you say, *maybe* someone will see a use in it.
If they do, *maybe* you can sell it. Simple. You don't even have to be
born in England to fiqure that one out. A dumbass redneck Texan
like I can see that simple solution in a half second.
If you build it, and it works, maybe they will come.
If you build it and it doesn't work, probably they won't.
To foist among the public a "miracle whip" which you haven't even
taken time to test in the real world is the ultimate charade.
I can make a puter modeling program spit out nearly anything I want
if I caress it in a favorable manner. I imagine others can too. Ask
Cecil about his dipoles that show in excess of 20 dbi.. Sure the
"supergain" can be there *if* you can get power to the antenna with
that super low feedpoint Z. Good luck in the contest trying to achieve
this
task. I bet I could keep up with you using a regular coax fed dipole
and
5 watts power.
You seem to require our permission for you to tinker with this new
miracle whip array. Well, you have my official permission to knock
yourself out.
BTW, why is it that you can't make post without whining about Roy,
Richard, Dave, etc, etc.
I was building a new fangled miracle whip, and they told me it wouldn't

work as planned, I'd tend to listen to them myself. If I had trouble
believing
them, I would build a real antenna instead of arguing about it on
usenet.
If your theory? is correct, it should work as planned. If not.. Well...
Time to conjur up a new miracle whip.
Lurk mode off, and back to those silly boat wrecking rednecks in
Deliverence..
MK

  #7   Report Post  
Old December 29th 06, 03:11 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Gaussian law and time varying fields

Heh, I didn't read all that you had to say but I am glad you posted and
hopefully you told your friends to come on over and join in with
you,.The more the merrier I say especially people like you so that we
can give a demonstration as to what ham radio is all about. I will read
the rest of what you wrote incase I missed something that was of
consequence which is why you should call all your fellow hams what ham
radio is all about plus your contribution to make it move in the way
that you want. To make an impact you must have numbers to be heard.
World Radio will not report the goings on on this newsgroup until we
get the numbers up So please, please call your friends and tell them
about this newsgroup and tell them to start at the beginning of each
thread so they can judge ham radio for themselves. Just loved your
contribution to this thread, we need more people like you on this group
to guide others how they should participate, yours is an excellent
example
Cheers
Art




wrote:
art wrote:
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade

Art


How can we miss it with the multi-postings? But in order for *you*
to see the charade, I'm afraid a mirror will be needed.
You **** and whine because no one can understand the silly
jibber jabber you throw out...
You **** and whine because no one will try to do or repeat work *you*
should be doing, or already have done.
The solution to your problem is actually very simple, and Dave has
already
given it to you. Build the dang thing and see if it works as you say
on an antenna range.
If it works as you say, *maybe* someone will see a use in it.
If they do, *maybe* you can sell it. Simple. You don't even have to be
born in England to fiqure that one out. A dumbass redneck Texan
like I can see that simple solution in a half second.
If you build it, and it works, maybe they will come.
If you build it and it doesn't work, probably they won't.
To foist among the public a "miracle whip" which you haven't even
taken time to test in the real world is the ultimate charade.
I can make a puter modeling program spit out nearly anything I want
if I caress it in a favorable manner. I imagine others can too. Ask
Cecil about his dipoles that show in excess of 20 dbi.. Sure the
"supergain" can be there *if* you can get power to the antenna with
that super low feedpoint Z. Good luck in the contest trying to achieve
this
task. I bet I could keep up with you using a regular coax fed dipole
and
5 watts power.
You seem to require our permission for you to tinker with this new
miracle whip array. Well, you have my official permission to knock
yourself out.
BTW, why is it that you can't make post without whining about Roy,
Richard, Dave, etc, etc.
I was building a new fangled miracle whip, and they told me it wouldn't

work as planned, I'd tend to listen to them myself. If I had trouble
believing
them, I would build a real antenna instead of arguing about it on
usenet.
If your theory? is correct, it should work as planned. If not.. Well...
Time to conjur up a new miracle whip.
Lurk mode off, and back to those silly boat wrecking rednecks in
Deliverence..
MK


  #8   Report Post  
Old December 29th 06, 03:14 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 757
Default Gaussian law and time varying fields


art wrote:
Just loved your
contribution to this thread, we need more people like you on this group
to guide others how they should participate, yours is an excellent
example
Cheers
Art


Thanks Art. Always glad to help out. Anytime.. Just give me a ring.
MK

  #9   Report Post  
Old December 29th 06, 03:31 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Gaussian law and time varying fields

Great I knew you would like that, we need experienced antenna experts
like you on this group , your instant judgements on antennas are a
delight to all, quick fast and to the point what ever your point is
Have you called any of your buddies yet I am anxious to swell the
rankings of this group, it seems to get bigger my the minuit Advertise
the newsgroup of Ham Radio so we can get the numbers up of people like
yorself a perfect example of what people are missing by not joining us.
We are so much better than CB if you like the fighting banter
Cheers and beers
Art



wrote:
art wrote:
Just loved your
contribution to this thread, we need more people like you on this group
to guide others how they should participate, yours is an excellent
example
Cheers
Art


Thanks Art. Always glad to help out. Anytime.. Just give me a ring.
MK


  #10   Report Post  
Old December 29th 06, 03:56 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 757
Default Gaussian law and time varying fields


art wrote:
Great I knew you would like that, we need experienced antenna experts
like you on this group , your instant judgements on antennas are a
delight to all, quick fast and to the point what ever your point is


Yea, my point is for me to know, and others to find out...

Have you called any of your buddies yet


Nope.. I'm on a new movie now... The boat wrecking rednecks went home.

I am anxious to swell the
rankings of this group, it seems to get bigger my the minuit


Not me.. The more posts, the longer it takes me to read them.
People, lets keep things simple if you please.. Thank you.

Advertise
the newsgroup of Ham Radio so we can get the numbers up of people like
yorself a perfect example of what people are missing by not joining us.


This place is a hoot, thats fer sure.. CW, CB, Rednecks, Miracle Whips,
heck, what for can you ask for?

We are so much better than CB if you like the fighting banter


This ain't ham radio or CB. This is usenet.

Cheers and beers


Well, I might have one new years maybe... But I generally don't drink
anymore.
And if I did, it probably won't be a beer. More like a big Texas sized
heaping
helping of Crown Royal, the favored brew of us fisticated rednecks.
But I probably won't, cuz it would give me brain damage the next day.
I can't afford to lose any brain cells if I want to deal with sharp
guys like you
on a regular basis. :/
Woe is me..
MK



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017