Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan Wolfe wrote:
The demise of the Morse requirement, however, could be a boon for ham radio itself. After the FCC decision, demand for information about radio licenses surged from about 200 in a typical weekend to about 500, according to the American Radio Relay League, an organization representing ham radio operators. ...... "It's part of the dumbing down of America," said Nancy Kott, editor of World Radio magazine In the R&O, the FCC observed that there was no connection between morse code knowledge and compliance with the rules. The old 14.313 disaster was back in the days of 13 WPM and above coded hams. And VHF didn't turn into a CB mess since no code technician licenses started. And HF didn't get worse with 5WPM generals and extras. So as far as the FCC is concerned, they decided that there was no regulatory point in keeping element 1 in the tests. And the FCC isn't in the business of handing out merit badges. The whole point in requiring license testing is to be sure that people are at least aware of the responsibilities involved with transmitting RF into the radio spectra, that we do it in such a way that doesn't trash the spectrum for other users, ham and others. We then get permission to build, modify and so on transmitting equipment if we want to. CBers or FRSers are not supposed to do that. As for newbies, virtually all new hams want to be accepted into our world, and will learn and adjust their operating habits as needed to be accepted. This has been true since day one, and aside from a few fools saying things like "No kids, no lids, and no space cadets" everyone knows what it was like to be a newbie. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs? | General | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB |