Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message et... Jimmie D wrote: I made one of these sleeve antennas for 10M with the folded back shield, put a KW on it and it arced through the black vinyl. It's a standing wave antenna. The voltage at the end of the shield is approximately 20 times the voltage at the feedpoint. For a KW, that's more than 5 kV, too much for ordinary coax. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com No kidding!!!!! |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Jimmie D wrote: I made one of these sleeve antennas for 10M with the folded back shield, put a KW on it and it arced through the black vinyl. It's a standing wave antenna. The voltage at the end of the shield is approximately 20 times the voltage at the feedpoint. For a KW, that's more than 5 kV, too much for ordinary coax. Yeah, but tape a couple of ne-2 bulbs there and you can get that kool old cb look when they light up on key down!!! silly grin Regards, JS |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() snip "Bryan" wrote in message I'm not sure I follow your line of thinking in regard to moving the shield up/down. Bryan Perhaps I am over-analyzing it. Here's what I meant: To make the antenna, a quarter wave section of shield is exposed, then inverted and pulled down over the outside of the coax jacket. If it's pulled down TIGHT, it has maximum length and minimum spacing to the part of the shield under the jacket, hence the greatest decoupling takes place, if I understand the principle of the antenna. However, what I alluded to earlier was moving the end of the shield up and down as a tuning method. I said this because another poster said you tune the thing by changing the length of the coax section and/or the shield section; I was looking for a non-cutting method to change the length of the shield portion and merely pushing the end upward seemed to be viable. (I'm sure the shield is sufficiently flexible to allow this.) If the end of the shield is pushed upward, it shortens the shield and should shift resonance up. So, I imagine I can cut the shield section for slightly more than a quarter wave, then tune it as I described. The upper section can be tuned with dikes and/or a soldering iron, as necessary. "Sal" |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sal M. Onella wrote:
snip Bryan wrote: I'm not sure I follow your line of thinking in regard to moving the shield up/down. Bryan Perhaps I am over-analyzing it. Here's what I meant: To make the antenna, a quarter wave section of shield is exposed, then inverted and pulled down over the outside of the coax jacket. If it's pulled down TIGHT, it has maximum length and minimum spacing to the part of the shield under the jacket, hence the greatest decoupling takes place, if I understand the principle of the antenna. However, what I alluded to earlier was moving the end of the shield up and down as a tuning method. I said this because another poster said you tune the thing by changing the length of the coax section and/or the shield section; I was looking for a non-cutting method to change the length of the shield portion and merely pushing the end upward seemed to be viable. (I'm sure the shield is sufficiently flexible to allow this.) If the end of the shield is pushed upward, it shortens the shield and should shift resonance up. So, I imagine I can cut the shield section for slightly more than a quarter wave, then tune it as I described. The upper section can be tuned with dikes and/or a soldering iron, as necessary. "Sal" I "groc" you, now. Sure, why not?! Bryan |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message et... Jimmie D wrote: I made one of these sleeve antennas for 10M with the folded back shield, put a KW on it and it arced through the black vinyl. It's a standing wave antenna. The voltage at the end of the shield is approximately 20 times the voltage at the feedpoint. For a KW, that's more than 5 kV, too much for ordinary coax. I have 160 watts available. ... about 90 volts at the feedpoint, so a whopping 1800 at the end of the shield. (Might want to keep the mike gain throttled back.) OR ... use a larger braid over a spacer of some kind and solder it to the coax braid at the feedpoint. The spacer could be a piece of plastic pipe slipped over the coax at the outset. Actually, the braid doesn't really have to be braid. It could be a piece of copper pipe. The tuning operation would need to be slightly different; I'll need to keep a few inches of the original coax near the feedpoint. I'll tune it by sliding the pipes and bunching up the coax at the feedpoint. Or tune it by adjusting the length of the center conductor element. I wonder ... if the pipe were sufficiently large, it would tend to broadband the antenna. I know of this effect at UHF. How about 10m??? I'm looking forward to this. g |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks! I'll try to remember that. In the past RACES exercise, I was
stationed in the City Health Department Conference Room, which is Downtown and practically under the local repeater towers. This is also why I was not TOO worried about obtaining a particularly high gain antenna, and was more concerned with being unobtrusive. However, inside that building, the rubber ducky antenna worked, but just barely, so I took the mobile antenna off my Tahoe and screwed it onto my HT, using an SMA to Coax adapter. That received much better, but was a little unwieldly, plus it puts a little more strain on the little SMA connector than I like. This little "TV Antenna Feed Line" J-Pole should be just the ticket for any situation like this in the future. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message . net... Chuck James wrote: Well, I finally took the time to work on the "TV Antenna Feed Line" J-Pole someone suggested. I got it down to less than 1.6 SWR, on 2 meter, and less than 1.2 on 70 cm, by trimming it down 1/8 inch at a time. So now I have a VERY portable dual band antenna, I can just roll up and stick in a small "go bag". I tried it on my Yaesu VX-6R and was able to hit several local repeaters, some, of them even on low power. A little trick I learned in AZ - It will work better on 440 if you slant it toward the repeater. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() .. I wonder ... if the pipe were sufficiently large, it would tend to broadband the antenna. I know of this effect at UHF. How about 10m??? I'm looking forward to this. g Yes it does, solves some of the problem you have with the all coax type of sleeve antenna. stuff some pieces of styrofoam inside the pipe to center the coax. Wind a choke in you coax and it is a pretty decent antenna. Consider this, make the sleve out of 2 inch conduit, at the middle of the antenna put a cap on the pipe with a hole drilled to accept a mount for a whip, RS and truck stops sell these. Bottom end screws into a 2inch PVC pullbox, other side of the pullbox screws on another piece of pipe used as a mast. There should be enough room in the pullbox for the choke. |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jimmie D wrote:
. I wonder ... if the pipe were sufficiently large, it would tend to broadband the antenna. I know of this effect at UHF. How about 10m??? I'm looking forward to this. g Yes it does, solves some of the problem you have with the all coax type of sleeve antenna. stuff some pieces of styrofoam inside the pipe to center the coax. Wind a choke in you coax and it is a pretty decent antenna. Consider this, make the sleve out of 2 inch conduit, at the middle of the antenna put a cap on the pipe with a hole drilled to accept a mount for a whip, RS and truck stops sell these. Bottom end screws into a 2inch PVC pullbox, other side of the pullbox screws on another piece of pipe used as a mast. There should be enough room in the pullbox for the choke. Or, just lengthen it out to a full wave dipole, provide a matching circuit of your choice, add a 1:1 current balun and end up with a MUCH more desirable antenna ... Oh yeah, you still can use the ne-2 bulbs at either end (or both) of this dipole and end up with that kewl "cb look!" satisfied look moving on JS |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jimmie D" wrote in message news:Bdymh.17679$_X.15840@bigfe9... . I wonder ... if the pipe were sufficiently large, it would tend to broadband the antenna. I know of this effect at UHF. How about 10m??? I'm looking forward to this. g Yes it does, solves some of the problem you have with the all coax type of sleeve antenna. stuff some pieces of styrofoam inside the pipe to center the coax. Wind a choke in you coax and it is a pretty decent antenna. Consider this, make the sleve out of 2 inch conduit, at the middle of the antenna put a cap on the pipe with a hole drilled to accept a mount for a whip, RS and truck stops sell these. Bottom end screws into a 2inch PVC pullbox, other side of the pullbox screws on another piece of pipe used as a mast. There should be enough room in the pullbox for the choke. That's a clever idea. I am recalling four turns as the spec for the feedline choke at 2m. However, at 28 MHz, there's a lot less inductive reactance in those same four turns. How many turns are we looking at for the choke? |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sal M. Onella" wrote in message news:BFGmh.53728 I am recalling four turns as the spec for the feedline choke at 2m. However, at 28 MHz, there's a lot less inductive reactance in those same four turns. How many turns are we looking at for the choke? snip .... answering my own question: 4 feet of RG-58, coiled into 6 - 8 turns. [ARRL Antenna Handbook] "Sal" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
QUESTION: Roach/Squid Pole Antenna for 10, 20 and 40m? | Antenna | |||
Fishing pole element construction facts | Antenna | |||
Low band noise (a possible "hot pole" nearby) | General | |||
vertical di pole | Shortwave |