Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I finally took the time to work on the "TV Antenna Feed Line" J-Pole
someone suggested. I got it down to less than 1.6 SWR, on 2 meter, and less than 1.2 on 70 cm, by trimming it down 1/8 inch at a time. So now I have a VERY portable dual band antenna, I can just roll up and stick in a small "go bag". I tried it on my Yaesu VX-6R and was able to hit several local repeaters, some, of them even on low power. Thanks again to all that helped. "Jimmie D" wrote in message .. . "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:31:41 -0800, "Sal M. Onella" wrote: Either way, do we know the impedance? That is an "easy build" and I want to try some single-band, no-tuner HF antennas. Hi OM, The sleeve dipole makes for a pretty tall HF radiator and puts one end quite close to ground where a ground plane design, if you matched the heights of the feed points, would probably show less loss. As for impedance, it would be close to a conventional dipole - 70 to 75 Ohms. However, the proximity of earth (for HF) would alter that. Further, the jacket material that covers the outer braid is notorious for being rather lossy in its own right. When you draw the braid back over it, it creates a lossy transmission line with that material between the drawn back braid, and the jacketed braid it is covering. This does not normally concern most who build this style of antenna as it is one of those "precious" details that is argued endlessly while others put it to good use. One more thing: Assuming a nominal 50 ohm match can usually be made, is there any drawback to tuning the thing by making the braid a little longer than calculated, moving the end of the braid up and down to find the best match and then securing the end? It'll work just fine. The decoupling capacitance would be reduced by both the decrease in length and the increase in spacing, but the changed value would be, in effect, part of the tuning. This is the first I've heard of "decoupling capacitance." The lower arm of the vertical dipole is just that, the lower arm. It's proximity to the feed line will certainly impact the state of tune, but there is no claim to decoupling built into this design. You will have to provide for the usual considerations in that regard (but most neglect that too to no particular pain). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC I made one of these sleeve antennas for 10M with the folded back shield, put a KW on it and it arced through the black vinyl. Not exactly what I would call a "precious detail". Many years ago Shakespear antennas were made this way and they changed there design because of the same problem. Now they replace the folded back sheild with 4 or 5 wires imbeded in the fiberglass shell putting a good bit of air dielectric between the folded back part of the dipole and the sheild. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
QUESTION: Roach/Squid Pole Antenna for 10, 20 and 40m? | Antenna | |||
Fishing pole element construction facts | Antenna | |||
Low band noise (a possible "hot pole" nearby) | General | |||
vertical di pole | Shortwave |