Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yup, if it wasn't for CB the retail market wouldnt have done so well in
the past. Today we have no newcomers to buy things prefering to zero in on computors which is what the ham community is also doing tho to a lesser extent since age prevents change somewhat. Coffee breaks are now in vogue except for the few who miss the perceived statue they once attained and where others can pile in with grammer punctuated by swear words. But that is the same all over America we are a split society and continue to grow that way knowing a few bad apples will always overcome the britest in the barrel. Owen Duffy wrote: Gary KW4Z wrote in : ... rejection or level of noise with some was tremendous. I wouldn't take anything away from Ham's building their own antennas and feel that's the best way but I do miss the jumps in design account of the CB Boom of the 70's. ... I don't know how many of our new 6 hour hams I have worked on 40m who are using a Station Master (a 11m half wave with a base parallel tuned matching network) fed with 20m or so of RG58C/U and an ATU on 40m, and astonishlingly, VSWR is less than 1.01! We owe a lot to that CB technology! Owen |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know how many of our new 6 hour hams I have worked on 40m who are
using a Station Master (a 11m half wave with a base parallel tuned matching network) fed with 20m or so of RG58C/U and an ATU on 40m, and astonishlingly, VSWR is less than 1.01! We owe a lot to that CB technology! Owen Sounds like a poor substitute for a good 40 meter antenna to me. Ace - WH2T BTW my dummy load has a 1:1 VSWR on 40 meters but it doesn't hear very well. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Proper Phasing of two Andrew DB224 Antennas | Antenna | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Comparative Reference to Internet Resources for Antennas and Other Related Topics | Antenna | |||
Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB |