Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Richard, I remember your explanation about a dipole being no
attractor of anything except it's resonant freq. But I guess the the currents in the coax weren't "near enough equal" in this one case. Kind of defines lightning as it's own anomoly when it wants to be, huh. Jack Richard Harrison wrote Inside the coax, currents in one conductor induce opposing and near equal currents in each other, cancelling. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:14:21 -0500, "Jack Painter"
wrote: But I guess the the currents in the coax weren't "near enough equal" in this one case. This is the definition of Common Mode. Kind of defines lightning as it's own anomoly when it wants to be, huh. It means you lacked the Common Mode protection. Your earlier posting of: The coax in question was disconnected about 150' from the house, but lightning apparently jumped from the tower feed across a foot of air space and back into the PVC pipe channel housing several coax, which led to the house. The Drake was the luckiest of the second-story ungrounded shack gear. screams this big time. There was nothing anomalous about that lightning strike, it did what it was enabled to do. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Clark" wrote
It means you lacked the Common Mode protection. Your earlier posting of: The coax in question was disconnected about 150' from the house, but lightning apparently jumped from the tower feed across a foot of air space and back into the PVC pipe channel housing several coax, which led to the house. The Drake was the luckiest of the second-story ungrounded shack gear. screams this big time. There was nothing anomalous about that lightning strike, it did what it was enabled to do. Richard, do you mean that if the coax had been left connected to the dipole it would have afforded common-mode protection? I think I understand what you're saying but would appreciate you tying that principle together. Thanks. Jack |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:02:38 -0500, "Jack Painter"
wrote: Richard, do you mean that if the coax had been left connected to the dipole it would have afforded common-mode protection? I think I understand what you're saying but would appreciate you tying that principle together. Thanks. Jack Hi Jack, Ask yourself "Where is ground in this picture?" THAT is the Common of the Common Mode. I see it discussed nowhere in your description. There is the inference of it being back in the house (code requires it) where lightning eventually found it, the hard way. As you describe it: The coax in question was disconnected about 150' from the house, disconnected where, how? Up the tower? At the bottom of the tower? Is the tower grounded? Does the tower ground meet code in being tied to the house ground? Is the coax grounded? Where? Does it supply ground? Where? The Drake was the luckiest of the second-story ungrounded shack gear. No ground? There are two problems with this statement. 1.) It is unlikely due to code; 2.) It means you accept Common Mode problems. It being unlikely does not mean you are protected (experience proves this), it means you went with the flow - of several KV. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard, my earlier posts described the grounding my friend, here is quick
summary: 1.Well grounded 100' tower, hundreds of feet of many radials, rods, etc. Survived many strikes. 2. Feedline from tower's dipole was disconnected about 20' from tower where it enters a buried pvc conduit that travels 150' to house, then up to second story shack. Where nothing is grounded, except by virtue of house AC wiring - a bad I know (not mine either). 3. Ground current from the tower strike most likely entered the coax feedlines at the disconnect point as they entered the pvc conduit then traveled on into house. 4. House current also took huge jolts, zorching all kinds of connected equipment, phones, tv's etc. 5. Outbuilding with radio equipment connected took huge hit, ball lightning inside room fried test cords connected to nothing, hanging on test bench, where the leads touched tile floor, huge blow-out of tile. AC power blew wall warts across room, computers next to each other had .22 rifle bullet sized hole between them. Equipment in this bldg was grounded, and some that was was damaged, others not touched. In short, a massive, multiple strike-path hit that may not be protectable from - but I realize there was a lot missing from a good ground picture here also. Jack "Richard Clark" wrote Ask yourself "Where is ground in this picture?" THAT is the Common of the Common Mode. I see it discussed nowhere in your description. There is the inference of it being back in the house (code requires it) where lightning eventually found it, the hard way. As you describe it: The coax in question was disconnected about 150' from the house, disconnected where, how? Up the tower? At the bottom of the tower? Is the tower grounded? Does the tower ground meet code in being tied to the house ground? Is the coax grounded? Where? Does it supply ground? Where? The Drake was the luckiest of the second-story ungrounded shack gear. No ground? There are two problems with this statement. 1.) It is unlikely due to code; 2.) It means you accept Common Mode problems. It being unlikely does not mean you are protected (experience proves this), it means you went with the flow - of several KV. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:07:24 -0500, "Jack Painter"
wrote: Richard, my earlier posts described the grounding my friend, here is quick summary: 1.Well grounded 100' tower, hundreds of feet of many radials, rods, etc. Survived many strikes. 2. Feedline from tower's dipole was disconnected about 20' from tower where it enters a buried pvc conduit that travels 150' to house, then up to second story shack. Where nothing is grounded, except by virtue of house AC wiring - a bad I know (not mine either). 3. Ground current from the tower strike most likely entered the coax feedlines at the disconnect point as they entered the pvc conduit then traveled on into house. 4. House current also took huge jolts, zorching all kinds of connected equipment, phones, tv's etc. 5. Outbuilding with radio equipment connected took huge hit, ball lightning inside room fried test cords connected to nothing, hanging on test bench, where the leads touched tile floor, huge blow-out of tile. AC power blew wall warts across room, computers next to each other had .22 rifle bullet sized hole between them. Equipment in this bldg was grounded, and some that was was damaged, others not touched. In short, a massive, multiple strike-path hit that may not be protectable from - but I realize there was a lot missing from a good ground picture here also. Jack Hi Jack, You know, it sounds like the lightning hit your house/out-building and went toward the tower. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in message . ..
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:07:24 -0500, "Jack Painter" wrote: Richard, my earlier posts described the grounding my friend, here is quick summary: 1.Well grounded 100' tower, hundreds of feet of many radials, rods, etc. Survived many strikes. 2. Feedline from tower's dipole was disconnected about 20' from tower where it enters a buried pvc conduit that travels 150' to house, then up to second story shack. Where nothing is grounded, except by virtue of house AC wiring - a bad I know (not mine either). 3. Ground current from the tower strike most likely entered the coax feedlines at the disconnect point as they entered the pvc conduit then traveled on into house. 4. House current also took huge jolts, zorching all kinds of connected equipment, phones, tv's etc. 5. Outbuilding with radio equipment connected took huge hit, ball lightning inside room fried test cords connected to nothing, hanging on test bench, where the leads touched tile floor, huge blow-out of tile. AC power blew wall warts across room, computers next to each other had .22 rifle bullet sized hole between them. Equipment in this bldg was grounded, and some that was was damaged, others not touched. In short, a massive, multiple strike-path hit that may not be protectable from - but I realize there was a lot missing from a good ground picture here also. Jack Hi Jack, You know, it sounds like the lightning hit your house/out-building and went toward the tower. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Sounds like it. I'm fairly sure it didn't hit the tower. Or if it did, it also hit the houses at the same time. You don't get dime size holes in the house, unless the strike is traveling in the house. I don't think it's too likely ground currents traveled up the unconnected coax to the house. It would have gone on to ground at the tower, being it's well grounded. I think the upstairs part of the house was struck, and the coax from the drake, along with power wiring was the return to ground. Note all the damage in the house. Jack, you are one lucky $#^ *#^*@.... ![]() level from the upstairs drake may have routed a good bit of the strike out to ground. Not enough to save damage though..MK |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Painter wrote:
"But I guess the currents in the coax weren`t "near enough equal" in this case." Yes, and I can`t guarantee common-mode or equal currents. If the folded unipole gets zapped, equal or non-equal currents may flow in both conductors. Induced currents are likely to be differential-mode. But if they are differential-mode currents, something else likely happens. The line flashes over. I seem to be very lucky to never have damage with so many opportunities for damage. We never lost a transistor radio front end with countless strikes as evidenced by the pitted antennas. We know the coax arcs in broadcast stations. Most stations have automatic circuits to kill the transmitter when the coax arcs. In medium wave broadcast stations there is almost always a Faraday screen to keep down the harmonic radiation. It gets countless zaps as evidenced by pock marks and metal splattered about its shield box.Even so, the coax gets arcs. When you are on the air, transmitter energy keeps the arc alive once a transient has struck the arc. Most transmitters are equipped with a momentary kill relay whose d-c coil circuit is completed by the coax arc. As soon as the transmitter is killed, the relay is de-energized and the transmitter returns to the air. In the 2-way radio world, the transmitter is going to drop out in a moment when the mike button is released, or the station was in the receive mode when the lightning hit and there is no energy to sustain the arc. The arc prevents conveyance of the energy to the radio. I never saw a broadcast transmitter with evidence of lightning inside the transmitter and we have a good ides that these stations get struck almost every time a dark cloud passes by. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Working as a broadcast engineer at a MW (1390 kHz) station quite a few
decades ago, I have placed myself in the transmitter room so as to be able to look at the towers as a Summer storm passed. That transmitter did not have an automatic restore circuit. Well, I served as same. When I saw the lighting strike the towers, I would reset the breaker. The tubes (813s as I remember) would take that kind of abuse. My reflexes were good enough in those days that the listeners hardly knew anything happened. That is another trade that has disappeared. Richard knows! Have him tell about the cooked beasties across the current shunts. 73 Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA "Richard Harrison" wrote in message news:25140-40159FDA- snip I seem to be very lucky to never have damage with so many opportunities for damage. We never lost a transistor radio front end with countless strikes as evidenced by the pitted antennas. We know the coax arcs in broadcast stations. Most stations have automatic circuits to kill the transmitter when the coax arcs. In medium wave broadcast stations there is almost always a Faraday screen to keep down the harmonic radiation. It gets countless zaps as evidenced by pock marks and metal splattered about its shield box.Even so, the coax gets arcs. When you are on the air, transmitter energy keeps the arc alive once a transient has struck the arc. Most transmitters are equipped with a momentary kill relay whose d-c coil circuit is completed by the coax arc. As soon as the transmitter is killed, the relay is de-energized and the transmitter returns to the air. In the 2-way radio world, the transmitter is going to drop out in a moment when the mike button is released, or the station was in the receive mode when the lightning hit and there is no energy to sustain the arc. The arc prevents conveyance of the energy to the radio. I never saw a broadcast transmitter with evidence of lightning inside the transmitter and we have a good ides that these stations get struck almost every time a dark cloud passes by. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lightning Strokes, Masts & Volts | Antenna | |||
ON4SKY needs images of your lightning protection | Antenna | |||
Lightning protection for remotely tuned wire antenna | Antenna | |||
Lightning Arrester | Antenna | |||
Lightning protection question revisited | Antenna |