Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carl R. Stevenson wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... The basic problem is that some folks either didn't read or didn't understand the test of the Report and Order. I believe Jim meant "text" not "test" above - an easy typo to make. Yep! FCC 06-178 can be downloaded from: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-06-178A1.pdf in PDF On Sheet 17 (of 41) it says: "VI. ORDERING CLAUSES ....... 40. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Part 97 of the Commission's Rules IS AMENDED as specified in Appendix A, effective [30 days after publication in the Federal Register]." There's no need of any external law tying FCC action to the Federal Register, because the FCC did that as part of the R&O itself, rather than specifying an effective date. There is an "external law" which ties all federal agency rulemakings to the Federal Register. It's called the Administrative Procedures Act and it's Title 5 USC, Chapter 5, sections 511-599. The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) is the law under which some 55 U.S. government federal regulatory agencies like the FDA and EPA (and FCC) create the rules and regulations necessary to implement and enforce major legislative acts such as the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, Clean Air Act or Occupational Health and Safety Act (and the Communications Act, as ammended). I did not know that! Thanks Carl! It makes perfect sense that there would be legislation requiring the publication of routine new rules in the Federal Register before they become effective. AFAIK, it's done this way to avoid conflicts. The R&O is effectively "out there" for anyone to look at, but if there were some sort of conflict with another govt. agency, etc., or a mistake in the R&O, FCC could take action before the effective date, and/or hold up implementation by not publishing. That's extremely doubtful in this case - the delay in getting the R&O published is almost certainly simple bureaucratic procedure. I'm sure that the delay (not abnormal at all) in publishing in the FR is just that - the bureaucracy. Agreed. Also, after having made a couple of obvious typos and contradictions in the "omnibus" R&O, FCC might be taking extra measures to be sure that sort of thing isn't in this one. Not all FCC actions go through that procedure. Emergency declarations are one example - they're usually effective immediately. True - but the APA requires that there be very good reasons for not giving the citizenry due and reasonable notice before new regulations take effect. Those emergency declarations are the exceptions that prove the rule IMHO. Sooner or later all the wheels will turn! Agreed ... Next Tuesday at the soonest. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MEET PROMO GIRL: THE VOICE THAT HAS STEPPED OUTSIDE THE CBC RADIO BOX | Shortwave | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
193 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (01-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (01-NOV-03) | Shortwave |