Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
cloth?: dipole coiley?
In article ,
Cecil Moore wrote: John Smith I wrote: Problems I ran into was soldering it together, soldering aluminum takes quite a bit more skill than copper!!! For some reason, the standard galvanized-dipped stuff is easy to solder. good idea technically speaking but i don't think i'll be able to hide anyof this stuff in his apartment if i go verticle i'd hope maybe to hide 2 counterpoise"" like wires around the far walls but certainly not mesh the only way i could think of using mesh is around the railing of the terrace hanging it verticle and putting the verticle antenna part ontop(higher) the railing is concreate |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
cloth?: dipole coiley?
good idea technically speaking but i don't think i'll be able to hide anyof this stuff in his apartment if i go verticle i'd hope maybe to hide 2 counterpoise"" like wires around the far walls but certainly not mesh the only way i could think of using mesh is around the railing of the terrace hanging it verticle and putting the verticle antenna part ontop(higher) the railing is concreate Indoor/outdoor carpet over the mesh would be OK. I get a little worried about more than a couple of watts around areas with people. The new TenTec rig that is built to remote over a Lan/internet will add more options soon. John Ferrell W8CCW |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
cloth?: dipole coiley?
John Ferrell wrote in
: I get a little worried about more than a couple of watts around areas with people. Ah, this must be in the vein of "they have been unable to prove EMR safe". There are clear guidelines / rules on maximum permitted exposure to EMR that should allow design and operation of a station with confidence that it most unlikely to be an EMR hazard to one's self, family or the general public. Understanding and applying this is just another facet of the hobby today, though I concede it is beyond our new 6 hour hams (though that is part of the reason for their low power limit, should they observe it). One of my current projects is a self contained field strength meter for field measurement near a transmitting antenna. It consists of a small single turn untuned square loop, terminated in a known load, a detector and an inexpensive battery power LCD panel meter, all self contained mounted on a non-conductive stick with no trailing wires. It is fairly straight forward to produce an Antenna Factor / Freq chart using NEC, and a detector calibration (Vout/Pin). Trials have been encouraging with good correlation with expected field strength. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that UV radiation is a health hazard, and there is no "safe" exposure level (ie a threshold below which no changes will take place in living cells). If one took a balanced approach, before becoming too concerned about EMR MPE, one would protect one's self from ANY sunshine, direct or indirect. If it appears that ham's brains have been addled by RF, they were probably that way before exposure to EMR, it might just be a factor for selection of hams. (You don't have to be mad to be a ham, but it helps!) Owen |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
cloth?: dipole coiley?
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:34:51 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:
John Ferrell wrote in : I get a little worried about more than a couple of watts around areas with people. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that UV radiation is a health hazard, and there is no "safe" exposure level (ie a threshold below which no changes will take place in living cells). If one took a balanced approach, before becoming too concerned about EMR MPE, one would protect one's self from ANY sunshine, direct or indirect. I am there too. The effects seem to be accumulative to some of us... If it appears that ham's brains have been addled by RF, they were probably that way before exposure to EMR, it might just be a factor for selection of hams. (You don't have to be mad to be a ham, but it helps!) Owen I managed to get an RF burn from a 25 watt nav transmitter once and it hurt! It was slw to heal as well. My problem is that I really don't know, I have yet to do that homework. I have a similar problem of my own in the near future. I have a 24 foot Winniebago RV that is at least skinned with fiber glass. I would like to try HF mobile Lots of homework ahead... John Ferrell W8CCW |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
cloth?: dipole coiley?
"John Ferrell" wrote in message ... On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:34:51 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote: John Ferrell wrote in m: I get a little worried about more than a couple of watts around areas with people. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that UV radiation is a health hazard, and there is no "safe" exposure level (ie a threshold below which no changes will take place in living cells). If one took a balanced approach, before becoming too concerned about EMR MPE, one would protect one's self from ANY sunshine, direct or indirect. I am there too. The effects seem to be accumulative to some of us... If it appears that ham's brains have been addled by RF, they were probably that way before exposure to EMR, it might just be a factor for selection of hams. (You don't have to be mad to be a ham, but it helps!) Owen I managed to get an RF burn from a 25 watt nav transmitter once and it hurt! It was slw to heal as well. My problem is that I really don't know, I have yet to do that homework. I have a similar problem of my own in the near future. I have a 24 foot Winniebago RV that is at least skinned with fiber glass. I would like to try HF mobile Lots of homework ahead... John Ferrell W8CCW I gave up trying to talk while driving, it only took one close call for me to quit. After I set up camp I lay some radials out on the ground and set up an 18 ft fibergalss whip. Vehicle has antennas for 10/11m and 2m. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
cloth?: dipole coiley?
Jimmie D wrote:
I gave up trying to talk while driving, ... While driving, I find it hard to talk on a cellphone but easy to talk on a ham radio. There's something about half-duplex, push-to-talk that makes it easier, maybe that I don't have to talk and listen at the same time. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
cloth?: dipole coiley?
John Ferrell wrote:
"The effects seem to be accumulative to some of us." Perhaps. Intensity, proximity, and radiated frequency are important in my experience. I worked years in a shortwave broadcasting plant where about a megawatt was being continuously radiated around the clock. No one of the many employees ever showed any effect from the exposure. One the other hand, my ham friend, W5OQJ, was a movie projectionist. He contracted a chest cold. In an attempt to "bake it out", he exposed his chest to the the ultra violet from the electric arc of the projector. Next morning, he was dead. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
cloth?: dipole coiley?
"Richard Harrison" wrote in message ... John Ferrell wrote: "The effects seem to be accumulative to some of us." Perhaps. Intensity, proximity, and radiated frequency are important in my experience. I worked years in a shortwave broadcasting plant where about a megawatt was being continuously radiated around the clock. No one of the many employees ever showed any effect from the exposure. One the other hand, my ham friend, W5OQJ, was a movie projectionist. He contracted a chest cold. In an attempt to "bake it out", he exposed his chest to the the ultra violet from the electric arc of the projector. Next morning, he was dead. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI Sounds like a guy I knew that pressed his face against the open end of a ..6MW peak radar trying to fix his sinus problem. He developed cancer there. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
cloth?: dipole coiley?
Jimmie D wrote:
Sounds like a guy I knew that pressed his face against the open end of a .6MW peak radar trying to fix his sinus problem. He developed cancer there. I know someone who drank water, and he got stomach cancer. The effects of high intensity radar have been studied in great depth for decades. As far as I know, no evidence has ever been found that they're able to cause cancer. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
cloth?: dipole coiley?
Richard Harrison wrote:
John Ferrell wrote: "The effects seem to be accumulative to some of us." Perhaps. Intensity, proximity, and radiated frequency are important in my experience. . . . Sure enough, I've got indisputable proof. The longer I'm a ham, the dimmer my eyesight and hearing, the shakier my hand, the unsteadier my gait. I can't remember things as well as I used to. And I'm even growing more hair out of my ears! Watch out, this stuff is dangerous in the long haul! Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Tilt ? - The Terminated Tilted Folded Dipole (TTFD / T2FD) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
I Want Another Antenna | Shortwave | |||
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Workman BS-1 Dipole Antenna = Easy Mod to make it a Mini-Windom Antenna ! | Shortwave | |||
Antenna Suggestions and Lightning Protection | Shortwave |