Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Performance wise, I don't think you could tell the real vertical from the T except for the T's lower feedpoint impedance. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp The T is better if he wants it to act like a DX vertical. The L is ok, but if the horizontal wire is fairly long, there will be a good bit of horizontal radiation. This can be good for a mix of NVIS and DX, but for DX only, the T is usually better. The T will have an overhead null the same as a normal monopole. I'd say most peoples L's on 160 have more horizontal wire than vertical... :/ I know mine did. I could only get mine about 45 ft vertical . That left 80-90 ft running across the backyard. I often feed my coax fed dipoles as a top hat vertical on 160 by shorting the coax, and feeding as a vertical. At the moment I have a turnstile on 80m, and a dipole on 40. "6 legs total" The 4 60 ft wires make a good "X" top hat.. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Why Tilt ? - The Terminated Tilted Folded Dipole (TTFD / T2FD) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
I Want Another Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Workman BS-1 Dipole Antenna = Easy Mod to make it a Mini-Windom Antenna ! | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |