Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This has become unusually entertaining.
....... snipydyduda However, I do not believe I have ever encountered a "scientist" who rejected both experimental and mathematical approaches at the same time. 73, Gene W4SZ Hey, this is getting off on the tangent, away from the original "problem". I and Barry W9UCW found, measured differences in the typical loading coil currents in order of 40 - 60%. See article and pictures on my web www.K3BU.us. W8JI and flat earth society proclaimed it can't be so. They argued and "calculated" that current at both ends of a loading coil in quarter wave loaded radiator has to be the same. W5DXP explained why the current is different, other sources and past publications affirm that. As I mentioned, time permitting, I will put together article explaining what is happening, describe experiments that can be replicated by non-believers and elaborate on the significance of the effect on the design of shortened (loaded) antennas. Nobody has argued the seven points I raised earlier, and those who measured, including W8JI found that current IS different (but still says it is NOT). The reality is that current is different, Eznec can't model it, you can speculate and theorize all you want, it will not revert the Earth to be flat. Big men will admit they were wrong, thank the enlighteners and RF life goes on. Yuri, K3BU.us |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |