| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil
Did you find something wrong with my suggestion above? I might also add that when considering coupling to a inductance the multiple placement of inductors does not help a bit since the coupling distance has no real reference points even tho one may decide the radiating member is the same diameter of the coil. This is why I suggested the new aproach. I would be very interested in any errors that you may spot in any part of the above where a dimensionless inductance is changed to one with actual dimensions. Regards Art "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Cecil Moore wrote: I just looked at the paper again and I don't see any files to download. Where are the files? I only have DOS-based EZNEC. Will it still work? Sorry Wes, the combination of a small screen, color-blindness, and cataracts causes me to miss a lot of things. I have successfully downloaded your zip files now. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||