Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wes Stewart wrote:
wrote: |A quick scan of your article produces nothing new. Fine. Then this thread is closed. I apologize, Wes. After closer inspection, I have to disagree with myself. Imax is the reference zero degree point for the "cosine rule". If that point occurs inside the loading coil, then the number of degrees occupied by the loading coil becomes ArcCos(Iin/Imax) + ArcCos(Iout/Imax) This helps to resolve the problem I was having with ArcCos(Iout/Iin). If, as you say, the current maximum point occurs inside the coil, then the forward current and reflected current are in-phase inside the coil and the coil occupies much more of the antenna than ArcCos(Iout/Imax) I do believe a "Thank you very much" is in order. For your antenna, the calculated degrees that the coil occupies is within 1.5 degrees of the estimated degrees. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |