Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Nope, nothing "wrong". I just avoid making assertions when I'm not 95% certain that I am correct. Thus, most of the time, I am unresponsive. I am 95% certain that the average humongous mobile loading coil is not "physically small" and is more like a certain percentage of a helical antenna which indeed does obviously demonstrate a net current gradient. It's certainly true that such a coil is not 'electrically' small. And it seems to me that most of the coil models assume "physically small" coils which leads me to my next question. Are there no models for "physically large" coils? The arguments involving "physically small" coils are only valid for physically small coils. What about all the other coils in the world that are not "physically small"? Do you mean physically small coils that are, naturally, also electrically small. Or do you mean physically small coils that are somehow electrically large? 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |