LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old February 2nd 04, 08:48 PM
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Cecil Moore wrote:

Jim Kelley wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Nope, nothing "wrong". I just avoid making assertions when I'm
not 95% certain that I am correct. Thus, most of the time, I am
unresponsive. I am 95% certain that the average humongous mobile
loading coil is not "physically small" and is more like a
certain percentage of a helical antenna which indeed does
obviously demonstrate a net current gradient.


It's certainly true that such a coil is not 'electrically' small.


And it seems to me that most of the coil models assume "physically
small" coils which leads me to my next question. Are there no models
for "physically large" coils? The arguments involving "physically
small" coils are only valid for physically small coils. What about
all the other coils in the world that are not "physically small"?


Do you mean physically small coils that are, naturally, also
electrically small. Or do you mean physically small coils that are
somehow electrically large?

73, Jim AC6XG
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
current/inductance discusion Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 54 January 4th 04 07:08 PM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017