| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Kelley wrote:
Art Unwin KB9MZ wrote: Jim What is electrically small and compared to what ?. I'm using the term in the same way one would use it to describe the length of an antenna - i.e. its physical length as opposed to its electrical length. As for the rest: I don't know about Cecil's underpinnings. ;-) All I know is that every time there's a calculated or measured current taper through a coil, according to some experts, it's because the coil is not "physically small". :-) So where's the model for "physically large" coils? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||